Background: Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is the most common form of heart muscle disease characterized by progressive dilatation and ventricular dysfunction. Metabolomics is an emerging and powerful discipline that provides a global information on the phenotype of mammalian systems via the study of endogenous and exogenous metabolites in cells, tissues and biofluids. These studies aid in the identification of biomarkers to prevent diseases in later life or help to early detect onset of diseases as well as aiding in the elucidation of disease mechanisms. Summary: Metabolomics provides a unique opportunity to discover biomarkers for DCM. This review demonstrates evidence of metabolite-based biomarkers useful for predicting, diagnosing and monitoring therapeutic interventions of DCM. Key metabolites identified as potential biomarkers for diagnosing DCM include acyl-carnitines, succinic acid, malate, methylhistidine, aspartate, methionine, phenylalanine. In terms of differentiating DCM from ICM, potential biomarkers including 1-pyrroline-2-carboxylate, norvaline, lysophosphatidylinositol (16:0/0:0), phosphatidylglycerol, fatty acid esters of hydroxy fatty acid, and phosphatidylcholine were identified. Acyl-carnitines, isoleucine and linoleic acid and tryptophan were the main biomarkers to monitor treatment response to DCM. Mapping metabolites to metabolic pathways revealed dysregulation of BCAA, glycolysis, tricarboxylic acid cycle and triacylglycerol and pentose phosphate metabolism which have therapeutic potential for DCM. This review shows several limitations including the use of small sample sizes, lack of interpretation of age and sex differences in most studies and the fact that studies have so far been limited to case-control study designs. Key messages: Metabolites have close proximity to disease phenotype. With recent advancements in metabolomics field, potential biomarkers for DCM have been identified based on studies using different biological and metabolomics technologies. However, multi-center studies with larger populations that will lead to validation of these identified biomarkers to enable their clinical translation and utilization are still needed.