2019
DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00989
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic Overlap in Environmentally Diverse Microbial Communities

Abstract: The majority of microbial communities consist of hundreds to thousands of species, creating a massive network of organisms competing for available resources within an ecosystem. In natural microbial communities, it appears that many microbial species have highly redundant metabolisms and seemingly are capable of utilizing the same substrates. This is paradoxical, as theory indicates that species requiring a common resource should outcompete one another. To better understand why microbial species can coexist, w… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, we see in Fig 2B there is a negative relationship between metabolic competition of bacterial species and phylogenetic distance. Our results are consistent with other previous studies of functional and metabolic relationships with phylogenetic distances [ 24 , 26 , 38 ]. And they support the theory of niche differentiation, which states that phylogenetically close species are more likely to compete with each other due to their shared traits and resource overlap, leading to less probability of their co-existence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, we see in Fig 2B there is a negative relationship between metabolic competition of bacterial species and phylogenetic distance. Our results are consistent with other previous studies of functional and metabolic relationships with phylogenetic distances [ 24 , 26 , 38 ]. And they support the theory of niche differentiation, which states that phylogenetically close species are more likely to compete with each other due to their shared traits and resource overlap, leading to less probability of their co-existence.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Our analysis shows that metabolic cooperation exhibits a positive relationship with phylogenetic distance, whereas metabolic competition exhibits a negative relationship. These findings support the results from previous work that studied the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and gene content, functional distance, and metabolic interactions [ 24 , 26 , 38 ]. Together these observed relationships seem to support the theory of niche differentiation, where functional overlap discourages phylogenetically related species from co-existing.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Several metrics for functional redundancy exist in the literature. Functional redundancy has been taken as the ratio of community richness and the theoretical maximum number of functional entities (Mouillot et al, 2014), median metabolic overlap of genomic traits (Hester, Jetten, Welte, & Lücker, 2019), expected variability in trait space among community members (Ricotta et al, 2016), the degree of covariance in functional diversity and biodiversity (e.g., Galand et al, 2018; Micheli & Halpern, 2005; Miki, Yokokawa, & Matsui, 2013), and the simple fraction of a community with a given trait (Trivedi et al, 2020; Tully, Wheat, Glazer, & Huber, 2018; Wohl, Arora, & Gladstone, 2004). Notably, these different metrics treat community structure differently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, these different metrics treat community structure differently. For instance, some metrics are sensitive to species abundances (Galand et al, 2018; Ricotta et al, 2016), richness (Micheli & Halpern, 2005; Mouillot et al, 2014), or neither (Hester et al, 2019). The diversity of metrics reflects the diverse sources of data used to calculate functional redundancy and the diverse research purposes for how this concept is applied in research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together, these studies have explored the relationship between functional 29 distances/metabolic overlap with phylogenetic relatedness, and they have given rise to 30 competing theories of 'habitat-filtering' and 'niche differentiation': habitat filtering 31 suggests that dominant species exhibit similar functional traits, whereas niche 32 differentiation says that phylogenetically similar species are unable to co-exist due to 33 similar traits and resource overlap (3). Nevertheless, methods have been developed for 34 inference of bacterial interaction network based on the assumption that phylogenetically 35 related species tend to co-exists. For example, Lo et al (15) developed phylogenetic 36 graphical lasso approach for bacterial community detection, based on the assumption 37 that phylogenetically correlated microbial species are more likely to interact to each 38 other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%