2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-113327/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

METABOLIC: High-throughput Profiling of Microbial Genomes for Functional Traits, Biogeochemistry, and Community-scale Metabolic Networks

Abstract: Background: Advances in microbiome science are being driven in large part due to our ability to study and infer microbial ecology from genomes reconstructed from mixed microbial communities using metagenomics and single-cell genomics. Such omics-based techniques allow us to read genomic blueprints of microorganisms, decipher their functional capacities and activities, and reconstruct their roles in biogeochemical processes. Currently available tools for analyses of genomic data can annotate and depict metaboli… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(104 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prodigal module (prodigal version 2.6.3) of METABOLIC was used to run multiple threads with the -p meta option to annotate open reading frames (ORFs) on all MAGs 74,75 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Prodigal module (prodigal version 2.6.3) of METABOLIC was used to run multiple threads with the -p meta option to annotate open reading frames (ORFs) on all MAGs 74,75 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metabolic reconstruction of each MAG was done using the METABOLIC-G program of METABOLIC (version 4.0) 75 . Summary information is available at https://github.com/escowley/HumanGutBacterialSulfurCycle.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another tool, Functional Ontology Assignments for Metagenomes (FOAM), although including biogeochemical cycling genes, does not permit visualization to facilitate interpreting functional profiles, and it annotates all protein sequences with a universal threshold value, which may lead to prediction biases ( Prestat et al, 2014 ). Some tools can be used in the analysis of genome, metagenome or metatranscriptome, e.g., METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ), iPATH ( Darzi et al, 2018 ), gapseq ( Zimmermann et al, 2021 ), MEGAN ( Huson et al, 2007 ), and SAMSA2 ( Westreich et al, 2018 ). The METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ) toolkit can assess microbial ecology and biogeochemistry based on evaluating the completeness of pathways in genomes or/and metagenome-assembled genomes, but is not directly based on calculating the relative abundance of pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some tools can be used in the analysis of genome, metagenome or metatranscriptome, e.g., METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ), iPATH ( Darzi et al, 2018 ), gapseq ( Zimmermann et al, 2021 ), MEGAN ( Huson et al, 2007 ), and SAMSA2 ( Westreich et al, 2018 ). The METABOLIC ( Zhou et al, 2020 ) toolkit can assess microbial ecology and biogeochemistry based on evaluating the completeness of pathways in genomes or/and metagenome-assembled genomes, but is not directly based on calculating the relative abundance of pathways. iPath ( Darzi et al, 2018 ) and gapseq ( Zimmermann et al, 2021 ) are applications for the visualization and analysis of metabolic pathways in a cellular genome or a set of gene sequences, but not metagenomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%