1971
DOI: 10.1128/aem.22.4.571-577.1971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic Factors Affecting Enhanced Phosphorus Uptake by Activated Sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 42.5°C, a significant decrease in these rates was observed, and at 45°C, the EBPR mechanisms were virtually absent. Boughton et al (1971) found that the degree of soluble aerobic ortho-P uptake varied over the temperature range from 5 o C to 60 o C, and reached a maximum at approximately 30 o C.…”
Section: Biological Phosphorus Removalmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At 42.5°C, a significant decrease in these rates was observed, and at 45°C, the EBPR mechanisms were virtually absent. Boughton et al (1971) found that the degree of soluble aerobic ortho-P uptake varied over the temperature range from 5 o C to 60 o C, and reached a maximum at approximately 30 o C.…”
Section: Biological Phosphorus Removalmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Investigations into biological phosphorus removal at process temperatures above 30 o C include those of Mamais and Jenkins (1992), Jones and Stephenson (1996) and Boughton et al (1971). In laboratory experiments on municipal wastewater, Mamais and Jenkins (1992) found that, at an MCRT of approximately 2.9 d, the temperature dependency of the EBPR organism growth rate, the anaerobic ortho-P release rate, the anaerobic soluble COD uptake rate, and the aerobic soluble ortho-P uptake rate could be described by an Arrhenius equation for mixed liquor temperatures between 10 o C and 30°C.…”
Section: Biological Phosphorus Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, consensus is lacking on the effect of temperature on phosphorus removal efficiency and stability. Several studies have documented better EBPR efficiency with increasing temperatures, suggesting that EBPR performance may be partially dependent on temperature, as is typical of many biochemical reactions (Baetens et al, 1999;Boughton et al, 1971;Brdjanovic et al, 1997Brdjanovic et al, , 1998Jones and Stephenson, 1996;Jones et al, 1987;Mamais and Jenkins, 1992;McClintock et al, 1993). These studies found either inhibition or reduction of phosphorus removal as temperatures dropped below 20uC and suggested various optimum temperatures, generally ranging from 24 to 37uC, with critical values of mean cell residence times to prevent PAO washout.…”
Section: Competition Between Polyphosphate-and Glycogen-accumulating mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, no systematic study of the temperature effects on EBPR is available, nor have the lower MCRT limits of EBPR been determined. Shapiro et al (1967) reported that anaerobic orthoPsol release rates decreased by 2.1-2.6 times for every 10 0 C temperature decrease in the range 10-30 o C. Boughton et al (1971) found 24-37 0 C to be the optimum range for aerobic orthoPsol uptake. Juni �1978) reported temperature optima for Acinetobacter growth of 34-35 c. Du Pree z et al (1978) cultured Acinetobacter in the temperature range 16-40 0 C and obtained the highest maximum growth rates between 29-35 0 C; maximum growth rates de creased rapidly at higher temperatures and no growth occurred at 41 0 C. Spatzierer et al (1985) observed a decrease of P removal efficiency in a full scale EBPR plant at temperatures below 10 0 C. In the 200 mgd Hyperion, Los Angeles CA plant, EBPR at 1.6 days MCRT was more prone to washout at 23 0 C than at 27 0 C (Shao, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%