2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13364-018-0375-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Metabolic cost of acute phase response in the frugivorous bat, Artibeus lituratus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
27
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of a febrile response in our study is in line with findings reported for insectivorous bats injected with LPS during the active phase (Stockmaier et al, 2015), and diverged from what is reported for bats challenged during the resting phase (Cabrera‐Martínez et al, 2019; Guerrero‐Chacón et al, 2018; Otálora‐Ardila et al, 2016, 2017). Similar to birds, it thus appears that body temperature changes after bats are injected LPS, following a circadian pattern where fever develops only when the injection is administered at the beginning of the resting phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Lack of a febrile response in our study is in line with findings reported for insectivorous bats injected with LPS during the active phase (Stockmaier et al, 2015), and diverged from what is reported for bats challenged during the resting phase (Cabrera‐Martínez et al, 2019; Guerrero‐Chacón et al, 2018; Otálora‐Ardila et al, 2016, 2017). Similar to birds, it thus appears that body temperature changes after bats are injected LPS, following a circadian pattern where fever develops only when the injection is administered at the beginning of the resting phase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Varying patterns in cellular response to LPS have also been found with other bat species. WBC counts increase 8 hr after intraperitoneal injection during the resting phase in Chaerephon plicatus (Molossidae; Weise et al, 2017) and 24 hr after subcutaneous injection in Desmodus rotundus (Phyllostomidae) injected during the active phase (Stockmaier et al, 2018), but no change was found in Molossus molossus (Molossidae; Stockmaier et al, 2015) and Artibeus lituratus (Phyllostomidae; Guerrero‐Chacón et al, 2018) 24 hr after subcutaneous injection in the active or the resting phase, respectively. The response of WBCs to LPS has been measured only in two bat families and further studies with members of other families will allow testing phylogenetic hypotheses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Immune responses have been measured in a few bat species using lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin that induces an inflammatory response by stimulating the release of cytokines 23,24 . Fever has been documented in response to an LPS challenge in three out of four species examined (Myotis vivesi 25 , Carollia perspicillata 26 , Artibeus lituratus 27 , but not in Molossus molossus 28 ). Some species exhibit clear leukocytosis (Carollia perspicillata 29 and Desmondus rotundus 30 ), while others shift the ratio of white blood cell types without a clear overall increase (Artibeus literatus 27 ) and others do not increase white blood cell production at all (Molossus molossus 28 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%