Metabolic adjustments to winter severity in two geographically separated great tit (Parus major) populations

Abstract

Understanding the potential limits placed on organisms by their ecophysiology is crucial for predicting their responses to varying environmental conditions. Studies to date have traditionally relied on between-species comparisons, however, recently, there has been a growing recognition of the importance of intraspecific variation in shaping an organism's ecological and physiological responses. In this context, widely distributed resident bird species offer a well-suited study system to examine intraspecific geographical variation in ecophysiological traits. A main hypothesis for explaining avian thermoregulatory mechanisms is the aerobic capacity model, which posits a positive correlation between basal (BMR) and summit (M sum) metabolism, caused by the energetic maintenance costs associated with increased muscle mass for shivering thermogenesis and enhanced investment in digestive organs for food processing. Most evidence for this hypothesis, however, comes from interspecific comparisons only, and the ecophysiological underpinnings of avian thermoregulatory capacities hence remain controversial. Here, we focus on great tits (Parus major), measuring winter BMR and M sum in two populations from different climates, a maritime-temperate (Gontrode, Belgium) and a continental (Zvenigorod, Russia) one. We test for the presence of intraspecific geographical variation in metabolic rates and assess the predictions following the aerobic capacity model. We found that metabolic rates differed between populations, whereby the birds from the maritime-temperate climate (Gontrode) showed higher (whole-body and mass-independent) BMR whereas conversely, great tits from Zvenigorod showed higher levels of both (whole-body and mass-independent) M sum. Within each population, our data did not fully support the aerobic capacity model's predictions. We argue that the decoupling of BMR and M sum observed may be caused by different selective forces acting on these metabolic rates, with birds from the continental-climate Zvenigorod population facing the need to conserve energy for surviving long winter nights (by keeping their BMR at low levels) while simultaneously being able to generate more heat (i.e., a high M sum) to withstand cold spells. We argue that the coupling or uncoupling of basal and maximum metabolic rates at the intraspecific level is likely influenced by different selective pressures that shape local adaptations in response to different climate regimes.