Meta-Review – Systematische Überprüfung von Literatur und qualitativen empirischen Ergebnissen

Haas, Yvonne; Neyer, Anne‐Katrin; Müller, Julia

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-23504-8_2

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No articles have been found in Web of Science. The first obvious result is, none of both terms have been used, neither in the title, nor in the abstract, nor as keywords (Haas et al, 2018). Thus, there is no 'direct' comparative review of ATLAS.ti™ and GABEK/WinRelan®, especially for their may be distinguished functionality (for another comparative review, see Alexa and Zuell, 2000).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

A comparison of the qualitative analysis tools GABEK/WinRelan® and ATLAS.ti™

Bohmann¹

2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, qualitative research became an increasing methodical approach besides quantitative analysis. For that, there are approx. 20 software packages. Two of them are GABEK/WinRelan® and ATLAS.ti™, which are less used than others. The aims of this study are (1) to compare directly both tools with each other by applying the tools, using a pre-interview and (2) to conduct expert interviews to come to a better understanding of how and why either GABEK/WinRelan® or ATLAS.ti™is used. As qualitative research is helpful to answer questions associated with hypothesis-generating research processes, such as quantitative methods, this paper aims (3) how those qualitative approaches can be analyzed by computer-assisted software. This paper conducted a literature review of both CAQDAS and applied the tools by using a pre-interview for the first comparison of both tools. In the further research, it is planned to conduct expert interviews with users to collect data for a deeper direct comparison of both tools. The results at this stage show that (1) there is no direct comparison of both tools, (2) GABEK/WinRelan® is less know than ATLAS.ti™ and (3) there are differences between the two tools, such as up-to-dateness and user friendliness. The paper concludes at this stage, that both tools have their advantages and disadvantages. GABEK/WinRelan® is with its “Gestalten”-approach (perceptive appearance of holistic processing of complexity) is a deep analysis tool, whereas ATLAS.ti™ has many functions, will be kept up-to-date and is more widespread within the scientific community.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%