2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03738-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-QTL analysis explores the key genes, especially hormone related genes, involved in the regulation of grain water content and grain dehydration rate in maize

Abstract: Background Low grain water content (GWC) at harvest of maize (Zea mays L.) is essential for mechanical harvesting, transportation and storage. Grain drying rate (GDR) is a key determinant of GWC. Many quantitative trait locus (QTLs) related to GDR and GWC have been reported, however, the confidence interval (CI) of these QTLs are too large and few QTLs has been fine-mapped or even been cloned. Meta-QTL (MQTL) analysis is an effective method to integrate QTLs information in independent populatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account the physical positions of markers, MQTLs were found to be scattered throughout almost the entire span of the chromosomes, consistent with the physical positions of MQTLs identified in previous meta-analysis studies. Differences in the physical positions of MQTLs reported in earlier studies [ 33 , 70 ] and the present study may be attributable to the usage of different genome assemblies for extracting the physical positions of MQTLs. The current study implemented the latest reference genome assembly ( Zm -B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0), whereas earlier meta-analysis studies employed the earlier reference genome assembly (Maize_B73_RefGen_v4) [ 33 , 71 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Taking into account the physical positions of markers, MQTLs were found to be scattered throughout almost the entire span of the chromosomes, consistent with the physical positions of MQTLs identified in previous meta-analysis studies. Differences in the physical positions of MQTLs reported in earlier studies [ 33 , 70 ] and the present study may be attributable to the usage of different genome assemblies for extracting the physical positions of MQTLs. The current study implemented the latest reference genome assembly ( Zm -B73-REFERENCE-NAM-5.0), whereas earlier meta-analysis studies employed the earlier reference genome assembly (Maize_B73_RefGen_v4) [ 33 , 71 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 65%
“…Three maize genes (GRMZM5G813206, GRMZM2G167220, and GRMZM2G467069) that could play important roles on lateral root and crown root development of maize were also identified. Wang et al (2022) carried out MQTL analysis using 282 QTLs from 25 experiments and identified 11 and 34 MQTLs associated with grain dry matter and low grain water content, respectively. Sheoran et al (2022) using a total of 542 QTLs, detected 32 mfeta-QTL possessing 1,907 candidate genes for different abiotic (drought, water logging, heat, and cold) stresses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-analyses of QTLs associated with a variety of traits have been recently conducted in different crops such as wheat ( Kumar et al, 2021 ; Kumar et al, 2022 A. C. ; Kumar et al, 2023 S. ; Saini et al, 2021 ; Saini et al, 2022 ; Tanin et al, 2022 ), rice ( Sandhu et al, 2021 ; Kumari et al, 2023 ), barley ( Akbari et al, 2022 ), common bean ( Shafi et al, 2022 ), pigeon pea ( Halladakeri et al, 2023 ), including maize ( Kaur et al, 2021 ; Sheoran et al, 2022 ; Wang et al, 2022 ; Gupta et al, 2023 ; Karnatam et al, 2023 ), for diverse traits, including both yield-related traits ( Semagn et al, 2013 ; Wang Y. et al, 2016 ; 2020 ; Chen et al, 2017 ; Zhou et al, 2020 ) and quality traits ( Jin et al, 2013 ; Dong et al, 2015 ). However, there is currently no comprehensive study on the genomic regions influencing both grain quality and yield in maize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%