2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-88908-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Modeling in Multiobjective Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
71
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Any remaining difference between the measured data and the best solution is due to missing parameters in the simulation, e.g., the finite conductivity of the conductive parts is not taken into account. Future work includes full inverse electrical characterization of textile materials by including the finite conductivity and extensions to Multiobjective Surrogate-Based Optimization (MOSBO) [44] methods. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Any remaining difference between the measured data and the best solution is due to missing parameters in the simulation, e.g., the finite conductivity of the conductive parts is not taken into account. Future work includes full inverse electrical characterization of textile materials by including the finite conductivity and extensions to Multiobjective Surrogate-Based Optimization (MOSBO) [44] methods. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of reviews of the use of these techniques in optimisation, including Jin (2005) and Knowles and Nakayama (2008), as well as a dedicated edited volume on "Computational Intelligence in Expensive Optimization Problems" (Tenne and Goh, 2010) (in particular, reviews by Shi and Rasheed (2010) and Santana-Quintero et al (2010) therein). In addition, Razavi et al (2012) presented an extensive review of surrogate modelling in water resources and recent developments and applications to environmental systems are also presented in a special issue on "Emulation techniques for the reduction and sensitivity analysis of complex environmental models" (see Ratto et al, 2012).…”
Section: Current Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging surrogate models are also known as Gaussian Processes (GP) [13] or Gaussian Random Fields [14]. Originally proposed by Krige [15], Kriging was popularized for the Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (DACE) by Sacks et al [16], where it has proven to be very useful for tasks such as optimization [17,18], design space exploration, visualization, prototyping, and sensitivity analysis [19,20]. For a full survey of Kriging the reader is referred to [12] and [13].…”
Section: Kriging Interpolationmentioning
confidence: 99%