2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2006.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-modeling framework: A new approach to manage meta-modelbase and modeling knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ontologies are considered as appropriate modelling structures for representing complex domains under a homogenous terminology and a knowledge integration platform that handles structured or unstructured information resources [10]. Most platforms developed, however, provide a taxonomic (is-a) backbone, built on strict hierarchical (often disciplinary) intrarelations, that is used to detect mereological (part-of) inter-relations at the same or adjacent knowledge levels (see, e.g., [11][12][13]), a format that cannot satisfy the third part of integrating modelling. In most aquatic ecosystem ontologies (see e.g., [14][15][16][17], the scientific domain (and its scale) is drawn first and then the object of interest is represented as a downstream instance of this domain; there certainly exists the risk either to supersede interrelations existing beyond the domain's scale boundaries or to rely on partonomic functions that are not consistent with the site hydrogeobiochemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ontologies are considered as appropriate modelling structures for representing complex domains under a homogenous terminology and a knowledge integration platform that handles structured or unstructured information resources [10]. Most platforms developed, however, provide a taxonomic (is-a) backbone, built on strict hierarchical (often disciplinary) intrarelations, that is used to detect mereological (part-of) inter-relations at the same or adjacent knowledge levels (see, e.g., [11][12][13]), a format that cannot satisfy the third part of integrating modelling. In most aquatic ecosystem ontologies (see e.g., [14][15][16][17], the scientific domain (and its scale) is drawn first and then the object of interest is represented as a downstream instance of this domain; there certainly exists the risk either to supersede interrelations existing beyond the domain's scale boundaries or to rely on partonomic functions that are not consistent with the site hydrogeobiochemistry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%