Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2526-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-heuristics to solve single-machine scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup time and deteriorating jobs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applying this method has resulted in good outputs in both references [35] and [36]; the complete procedure of this technique is described in reference [35]. In the present paper, due to the implementation of the restart scheme after 20 consequent repetitions of the same result (experimentally, this value was selected powerfully because of the significant good results), the best chromosomes of the current population are transferred to next generation directly and the remaining population is replaced with feasible randomly generated chromosomes.…”
Section: Degamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Applying this method has resulted in good outputs in both references [35] and [36]; the complete procedure of this technique is described in reference [35]. In the present paper, due to the implementation of the restart scheme after 20 consequent repetitions of the same result (experimentally, this value was selected powerfully because of the significant good results), the best chromosomes of the current population are transferred to next generation directly and the remaining population is replaced with feasible randomly generated chromosomes.…”
Section: Degamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various GA operators such as crossover, reproduction, mutation, etc. are utilized to get next generation of solutions [10]. This process is iterated till predefined number of iteration is reached or the optimum result is obtained or there is no improvement in the fitness of the population over a prescribed amount of iterations.…”
Section: Fig 3 Effect Of Data Polarity ( ) Parameter On the Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where j w is the computational value at the node of j-th probe obtained from Eq (1). The optimal algorithm [6][7][8][9][10] is needed to determine the correction coefficients. The flow chart of PSO is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Modified Gauss Weighting Interpolation Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%