2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2017.07.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-heuristic framework: Quantum inspired binary grey wolf optimizer for unit commitment problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, we hope to show the performance of DCABC by Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) [35,36] in our future work. We only test the new algorithm on classical benchmark functions and have not used it to solve practical problems, such as fault diagnosis [37], path plan [38], Knapsack [39][40][41], multi-objective optimization [42], gesture segmentation [43], unit commitment problem [44], and so on. There is an increasing interest in prompting the performance of DCABC, which will be our future research direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, we hope to show the performance of DCABC by Null Hypothesis Significance Testing (NHST) [35,36] in our future work. We only test the new algorithm on classical benchmark functions and have not used it to solve practical problems, such as fault diagnosis [37], path plan [38], Knapsack [39][40][41], multi-objective optimization [42], gesture segmentation [43], unit commitment problem [44], and so on. There is an increasing interest in prompting the performance of DCABC, which will be our future research direction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a quantum approach, continuous algorithms are adapted based on the uncertainty principle, where position and velocity cannot be determined simultaneously. In [43], a quantum binary gray wolf optimizer is proposed to solve the unit commitment problem. Using a quantum binary lightning search algorithm, in [44], the optimal placement of vehicle-to-grid charging stations in the distribution power system was addressed.…”
Section: Related Binarization Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… λi=Fcfalse(UGfalse(ifalse)false)/UGfalse(ifalse)=ai/UGfalse(ifalse)+bi+ciUGfalse(ifalse) For each t , normalΔPt=iNGuGfalse(ifalse)tUGfalse(ifalse)bNBPd,bt. If normalΔPt<0, an off‐line unit uGfalse(ifalse)t with the lowest λi is set to 1 until normalΔPt0. (3) Adjustment for minimum up/down time limitations [47, 49]. The capacity based on the above treatment may over‐supply compared to demand.…”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Adjustment for minimum up/down time limitations [47, 49]. The capacity based on the above treatment may over‐supply compared to demand.…”
Section: Solution Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%