2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icdm.2018.00081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Graph Based HIN Spectral Embedding: Methods, Analyses, and Insights

Abstract: Heterogeneous information network (HIN) has drawn significant research attention recently, due to its power of modeling multi-typed multi-relational data and facilitating various downstream applications. In this decade, many algorithms have been developed for HIN modeling, including traditional similarity measures and recent embedding techniques. Most algorithms on HIN leverage meta-graphs or meta-paths (special cases of meta-graphs) to capture various semantics. Given any arbitrary set of meta-graphs, existin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deep network embedding models. Previous network representation learning models primarily focus on improving the learning ability such as preserving original network structural information and properties [3] or semantic correlations of different types of nodes and relationships [31], [12], [41]. Unlike these, LIME aims to improve the efficiency in computational resources and training time to allow the learning algorithm to scale to large networks and to respond to a dynamically changing HIN quickly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep network embedding models. Previous network representation learning models primarily focus on improving the learning ability such as preserving original network structural information and properties [3] or semantic correlations of different types of nodes and relationships [31], [12], [41]. Unlike these, LIME aims to improve the efficiency in computational resources and training time to allow the learning algorithm to scale to large networks and to respond to a dynamically changing HIN quickly.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several other relevant works on heterogeneous networks have been proposed (Sun et al, 2011;Chang et al, 2015;Tang et al, 2015a;Chen & Sun, 2017;Fu et al, 2017;Jiang et al, 2017;Shi et al, 2018;Yang et al, 2018). The work by Sun et al (2011) is also based on meta paths but it focuses on defining a similarity measure instead of learning representations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shi et al (2018) proposes learning different representations per node to address different aspects of nodes encapsulated within the heterogeneous network which is an interesting idea but is out of the scope of this paper. The idea of combining and reducing heterogeneous information is also presented in Yang et al (2018) but they focus on meta graphs rather than meta paths and use deep denoising autoencoders for unsupervised dimensionality reduction.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To capture such complex interactions, the tool of meta-path has been proposed and leveraged by most existing models on heterogeneous networks [18]. Traditional object proximity models measure the total strength of various interactions by counting the number of instances of different meta-paths between objects and adding up the counts with pre-defined or learned weights [18], [23], [19], [37], [22], [21], [38], [14], [39], whereas the more recent network representation learning methods leverage meta-path guided random walks to jointly model multiple interactions in a latent embedding space [20], [40], [15], [41], [13], [42]. However, the consideration of a fixed set of metapaths, while helping regulate the complex interactions, largely relies on the quality of the meta-paths under consideration, and limits the flexibility of the model, which is unable to handle any interactions not directly captured by the meta-paths.…”
Section: A Heterogeneous Network Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%