2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3334629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta Dynamic Pricing: Learning Across Experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work has a close conceptual connection to work on meta-learning (see e.g., Finn et al, 2017;Baxter, 2000). As is nicely articulated by Bastani et al (2019), many companies face a large sequence of experimentation tasks, raising the question of how to effectively share information across these tasks. Consider a web company who may run thousands of A/B tests per year, giving them strong prior knowledge of the distribution of effect sizes and click through rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work has a close conceptual connection to work on meta-learning (see e.g., Finn et al, 2017;Baxter, 2000). As is nicely articulated by Bastani et al (2019), many companies face a large sequence of experimentation tasks, raising the question of how to effectively share information across these tasks. Consider a web company who may run thousands of A/B tests per year, giving them strong prior knowledge of the distribution of effect sizes and click through rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Each day can be viewed as its own instance of a bandit problem and the platform's goal is to do well on average across a large number of days. Bastani et al (2019) suggest an empirical Bayesian approach, where the prior of Thompson sampling is statistically estimated from data on previous tasks. This view of meta-learning as learning a prior distribution has long been recognized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several bandit approaches have also been explored recently. Bastani et al (2019) introduced an approach that uses Thompson sampling and a linear demand model to learn a pricing policy across multiple related products through pricing experiments. They defined a discrete set of auto loan products whereas in our approach the number of products is not fixed and new products may be defined as part of the continuous state.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Side Information: Thanks to historical data from past experiments, prior information about r is often available in the form of probabilistic prior (Bastani et al 2021b, Simchowitz et al 2021 or confidence intervals (Zhang et al 2020). In this case, we assume that side information about r is given as confidence intervals (as this can also be constructed with a given prior), i.e., ∀a ∈ A, r(a) ∈ [L(a), U (a)] (⊂ [0, 1]).…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%