2002
DOI: 10.1093/carcin/23.8.1343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta- and pooled analyses of the effects of glutathione S-transferase M1 polymorphisms and smoking on lung cancer risk

Abstract: Susceptibility to lung cancer may in part be attributable to inter-individual variability in metabolic activation or detoxification of tobacco carcinogens. The glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) genetic polymorphism has been extensively studied in this context; two recent meta-analyses of case-control studies suggested an association between GSTM1 deletion and lung cancer. At least 15 studies have been published after these overviews. We undertook a new meta-analysis to summarize the results of 43 published … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

14
138
2
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(156 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
138
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There was a significant increase in *1/*5 genotype in both the AML (OR ¼ 3.9) and ALL (OR ¼ 3.6) groups. CYP2E1 variants have been found to be associated with the susceptibility to several cancers such as colorectal [39], lung [40,41], stomach [42], lymphoma [23], and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [36,43]. CYP2E1 gene RsaI polymorphism in the 5 0 flanking (promoter) region affects its transcriptional activity [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was a significant increase in *1/*5 genotype in both the AML (OR ¼ 3.9) and ALL (OR ¼ 3.6) groups. CYP2E1 variants have been found to be associated with the susceptibility to several cancers such as colorectal [39], lung [40,41], stomach [42], lymphoma [23], and acute lymphoblastic leukemia [36,43]. CYP2E1 gene RsaI polymorphism in the 5 0 flanking (promoter) region affects its transcriptional activity [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restriction to the five studies with greater than 500 cases yielded no association with the GSTM1 null genotype (OR = 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14). A pooled analysis of 21 studies found similar risks for ever-smokers (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0 -1.2) and never-smokers (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 -1.4) [33]. In sub-analyses for studies carried out in Asia, there was a non-significant increase in risk for ever-smokers (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 -1.7) and a non-significant decrease in risk for never-smokers (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.4 -1.4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In sub-analyses for studies carried out in Asia, there was a non-significant increase in risk for ever-smokers (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.9 -1.7) and a non-significant decrease in risk for never-smokers (OR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.4 -1.4). However, these estimates were based on a relatively small number of study subjects [33]. Overall, the weight of evidence suggests that the GSTM1 null genotype is associated with at most a small risk of lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous genome scans were limited by the 25 in SHRSP and chromosome 2 congenic strains [34,35], GSTM genes were subject to association 1 studies in humans [39][40][41] due to the fundamental role of the oxidative stress pathway in 2 cardiovascular pathophysiology [42,43]. While there is agreement on the involvement of genetic 3 variants of GSTMs in the development of cancer [44,45], studies on the role of GSTMs in 4 cardiovascular diseases are less consistent [40,41]. This inconsistency suggests the necessity for 5 setting quality criteria for genetic association studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%