Meta-analytic structural equation modeling testing the rival assumptions of self-control and social bonds theories

Tehrani, Hossein Dabiriyan; Yamini, Sara

doi:10.1016/j.avb.2022.101759

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 52 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also used various methods to estimate publication bias, namely a fail-safe N, funnel plot, Egger’s test and trim and fill analysis. A similar procedure was employed in earlier meta-analyses (Tehrani and Yamini, 2020, 2022; Scherer et al ., 2019). We used the R packages metaSEM (Cheung, 2020) to conduct MASEM and the metafor package to estimate outlier analyses and publication bias (Viechtbauer and Cheung, 2010).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-construal, face concerns and conflict management strategies: a meta-analysis

Yamini

Fousiani

Wisse

2023

CCSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeIn this meta-analysis, the authors investigate the relationship between self-construal and conflict management strategies and shed light on the inconsistent findings in the literature. Moreover, they examine the mediating role of face concerns in this relationship. Importantly, the present meta-analysis is the first to test the assumptions of face-negotiation theory with the meta-analytic structural equation modeling (MASEM), which enabled the authors to test the hypothesized relationships in one single model.Design/methodology/approachThe authors used the method of MASEM to test the relationship between self-construal and conflict management and assess the mediating role of face concerns. In this regard, the authors employed one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling to perform MASEM and its moderators.FindingsTwo hundred fifty-four effect sizes based on thirty-three studies were pooled in this meta-analysis. The authors found that individuals with stronger independent self-construal and stronger self-face concerns were more likely to use forcing. Moreover, the relationship between independent self-construal and forcing was mediated by self-face concerns. Individuals with a stronger interdependent self-construal and individuals with stronger other-face concerns were more likely to use problem-solving and yielding. The relationship between interdependent self-construal and problem-solving and yielding was mediated by other-face concerns. Finally, interdependent self-construal also had an indirect effect, via other-face concern, on avoiding and compromising.Originality/valueThe present meta-analysis is the first effort that the authors are aware of to test the assumptions of face-negotiation theory (FNT) using MASEM method. The authors used one-stage meta-analytic structural equation modeling viewed as the state of the methods to perform MASEM and its moderators. They employed full information meta-analytic structural equation modeling to show the generalizability and heterogeneity of structural equation modeling parameters. They applied studentized deleted residuals to assess outlier analysis and also conducted different methods to perform MASEM to check the robustness of the findings resulted. Finally, the current study adds multiple methods of assessing for publication bias.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-construal, face concerns and conflict management strategies: a meta-analysis

Yamini

Fousiani

Wisse

2023

CCSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1In the present study, the term of secondary studies was employed against primary studies. Data are generated in a primary study, whereas secondary studies (e.g., meta-analysis) use primary research information as a source of data for analysis (Okoli & Schabram, 2010; Tehrani & Yamini, 2022). …”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of parenting program components on parental stress: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

Tehrani,

Yamini,

Vazsonyi

2024

Journal of Family Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study tested the effectiveness and ranking of the different combinations of parenting program components in reducing parental stress at the first posttreatment measurement in treatment settings for parents of children with disruptive behaviors. Fifty-seven studies were identified. Six different combinations of parenting program components were compared to the inactive component (control group), based on five active components (psychoeducation [PE], behavior management [BM], relationship enhancement [RE], parental self-management [SM], and parent as a coach [PC]). Except for BM with PE, all treatments, namely (a) BM with RE, (b) BM with SM, (c) BM with PE and SM and PC, (d) BM with RE and SM, and (e) BM with PE and RE and SM and PC, were effective in reducing parental stress when compared to the control group. The ranking of combinations provided evidence that BM with RE (e.g., parent-child interaction therapy) was the most effective combination for reducing parental stress. The evidence also indicated that more comprehensive parenting program components (BM with PE and RE and SM and PC, e.g., The Incredible Years) were less effective in reducing parental stress. The current findings indicate that parenting programs have the potential to reduce parental stress, even if programs are primarily aimed at improving children's behaviors.

show abstract

The effectiveness of parenting program components on disruptive and delinquent behaviors during early and middle childhood: a component network meta-analysis

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Meta-analytic structural equation modeling testing the rival assumptions of self-control and social bonds theories

Cited by 4 publications

References 52 publications

Self-construal, face concerns and conflict management strategies: a meta-analysis

Self-construal, face concerns and conflict management strategies: a meta-analysis

Effects of parenting program components on parental stress: A systematic review and component network meta-analysis.

The effectiveness of parenting program components on disruptive and delinquent behaviors during early and middle childhood: a component network meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About