Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)

Kepes, Sven; McDaniel, Michael A.; Brannick, Michael Τ.; Banks, George C.

doi:10.1007/s10869-013-9300-2

Cited by 181 publications

(155 citation statements)

References 99 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

151

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This study calculated the meta‐analytic correlation between all variables using the random effects model of meta‐analysis (Hunter & Schmidt, ), which can correct for artifactual variance and, thus, provide a more conservative effect size estimate (Kepes, McDaniel, Brannick, & Banks, ). Independent effect sizes were used to calculate the sample size‐weighted mean correlation (

\overset{r}{true}

).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary This meta‐analytic study examines the antecedents and outcomes of four recovery experiences: psychological detachment, relaxation, mastery, and control. Using 299 effect sizes from 54 independent samples (N = 26,592), we extend theory by integrating recovery experiences into the challenge–hindrance framework, creating a more comprehensive understanding of how both after‐work recovery and work characteristics collectively relate to well‐being. The results of meta‐analytic path estimates indicate that challenge demands have stronger negative relationships with psychological detachment, relaxation, and control recovery experiences than hindrance demands, and job resources have positive relationships with relaxation, mastery, and control recovery experiences. Psychological detachment after work has a stronger negative relationship with fatigue than relaxation or control experiences, whereas control experiences after work have a stronger positive relationship with vigor than detachment or relaxation experiences. Additionally, a temporally driven model with recovery experiences as a partial mediator explains up to 62% more variance in outcomes (ΔR2 = .12) beyond work characteristics models, implying that both work characteristics and after‐work recovery play an important role in determining employee well‐being.

show abstract

\overset{r}{true}

).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…HSMA ‘allows for the correction of statistical artifact and thus provides a relatively accurate estimate of the true average strength and variance of the relationship in the population of interest’ (Geyskens et al, , p. 526). Compared to Hedges and Olkin meta‐analysis (HOMA; Hedges and Olkin, ), which only corrects for sampling error, HSMA corrects for a broader array of statistical artefacts, including measurement error, dichotomization, and range restrictions (Heugens et al, ), making it a more appropriate choice for estimating mean effect sizes including subjective measures (Kepes et al, ). The HSMA method involves (1) estimating the population mean correlation and variability, (2) correcting for the statistical artefacts of sampling and measurement error, and (3) evaluating the existence and impact of moderators (Judge et al, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis

Vishwanathan

Oosterhout

Heugens

et al. 2019

J Management Studies

319

280

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study develops the concept of Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (Strategic CSR) by meta‐analyzing the available empirical evidence on the relationship between CSR and corporate financial performance (CFP). Using meta‐analytic structural equation modeling on effect size data from 344 primary studies, our study documents four empirical mechanisms explaining how CSR positively affects CFP: by 1) enhancing firm reputation, 2) increasing stakeholder reciprocation, 3) mitigating firm risk, and 4) strengthening innovation capacity. We propose these four mechanisms to identify four causally relevant attributes that allow us to conceptually distinguish Strategic CSR from CSR more generally. Our findings indicate that the four mechanisms combined explain 20 per cent of the CSR‐CFP relationship, suggesting that considerable room remains for future empirical research. The development of an empirically informed, causal conceptualization of Strategic CSR responds to a long‐heard call for better‐specified concepts in empirical CSR research.

show abstract

“…Following best practice guidelines (see Kepes et al., ), we systematically searched the literature on tipping for published and unpublished samples. Databases ( Ebscohost , the Social Science Citation Index , and Google Scholar ) were searched in September 2015.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Sensitivity analyses refer to assessments of the extent to which findings of analyses remain stable when assumptions or aspects of data or analyses change (Kepes et al., ). We conducted a variety of sensitivity analyses on the observed correlations to evaluate the robustness of the results at the distribution level (Kepes & McDaniel, ).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A meta‐analytic review of tipping compensation practices: An agency theory perspective

Banks

Woznyj

Kepes

et al. 2018

Personnel Psychology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tipping represents a form of compensation valued at over $50 billion a year in the United States alone. Tipping can be used as an incentive mechanism to reduce a principal–agent problem. An agency problem occurs when the interests of a principal and agent are misaligned, and it is challenging for the principal to monitor or control the activities of the agent. However, past research has been limited in the investigation of the extent to which tipping is effective at addressing this problem. Following an examination of 74 independent studies with 12,271 individuals, meta‐analytic results indicate that there is a small, positive relation between service quality and percentage of a bill tipped (trueρ¯̂ = .15 without outliers). Yet, in support of the idea behind tipping, relative weights analyses illustrate that service quality was a stronger predictor of percentage of the bill tipped than food quality, frequency of patronage, and dining party size. Evidence also suggests that racial minority servers tend to be tipped less than White servers (Cohen's d = .17), and women tend to be tipped more than men (Cohen's d = .15). Still, given the magnitude of the effect, one might question if tipping is an effective compensation practice to reduce the principal–agent problem. We discuss theoretical and practical implications for future research.

show abstract

Meta-analytic Reviews in the Organizational Sciences: Two Meta-analytic Schools on the Way to MARS (the Meta-analytic Reporting Standards)

Cited by 181 publications

References 99 publications

Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis

Recovery from work‐related effort: A meta‐analysis

Strategic CSR: A Concept Building Meta‐Analysis

A meta‐analytic review of tipping compensation practices: An agency theory perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About