2019
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the psychometric properties of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and associations with participant characteristics

Abstract: The aims of this study were to review the psychometric properties of the widely used Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) using meta-analytic methods, and to investigate the relationship between PCS scores and participant characteristics. A systematic search from 1995 found 229 experimental, quasi-experimental and correlational studies that report PCS scores. Multivariate regression explored variables related to pain catastrophizing and participant demographics. Across studies, good internal reliability (α = 0.92,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
66
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
66
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we still deem that further research is necessary to determine linguistic, cultural, or methodological influences that may have impacted these different cutoff points, which may also be related to the application of different language versions of pain-related questionnaires. [46] PLOS ONE…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we still deem that further research is necessary to determine linguistic, cultural, or methodological influences that may have impacted these different cutoff points, which may also be related to the application of different language versions of pain-related questionnaires. [46] PLOS ONE…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Van Lawick Pabst et al [10] concluded that, across different alcohol consumption levels, the sex differences in reported hangover symptom severity were not relevant. A recent meta-analysis revealed that also pain catastrophizing scores assessed with the PCS were unrelated to sex [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher values indicating more severe catastrophic thoughts about pain [ 35 ]. PCS has been previously validated for people with musculoskeletal conditions and has high test-retest reliability [ 36 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%