Meta-analysis of the Efficacy of Different Training Strategies in Animal Models of Ischemic Stroke

Abstract

Background and Purpose-Although several studies have shown beneficial effects of training in animal stroke models, the most effective training strategy and the optimal time to initiate training have not been identified. The present metaanalysis was performed to compare the efficacy of different training strategies and to determine the optimal time window for training in animal stroke models. Methods-We searched the literature for studies analyzing the efficacy of training in animal models of ischemic stroke.Training was categorized into forced physical training, voluntary physical training, constraint-induced movement therapy, and skilled reaching training. Two reviewers independently extracted data on study quality, infarct size, and neurological outcome. Data were pooled by means of a meta-analysis. Results-Thirty-five studies with >880 animals were included. A meta-analysis of all treatments showed that training reduced the infarct volume by 14% (95% confidence interval, 2%-25%) and improved the cognitive function by 33% (95% confidence interval, 8%-50%), the neuroscore by 13.4% (95% confidence interval, 1.5%-25.3%), and the running function by 6.6% (95% confidence interval, 1.4%-11.9%). Forced physical training reduced the infarct volume and enhanced the running function most effectively, whereas skilled reaching training improved the limb function most effectively. A meta-regression illustrated that training was particularly efficacious when initiated between 1 and 5 days after stroke onset. Conclusions-Our meta-analysis confirms that training reduces the infarct volume and improves the functional recovery in animal stroke models. Forced physical training and skilled reaching training were identified as particularly effective training strategies. The efficacy of training is time dependent. (Stroke. 2014;45:239-247.)

Induced pluripotent stem cells in rat models of Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

“…The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated by modifying a previously published 11-item quality scale (4,19). This modified scale consisted of the following six items: i) Random allocation to group; ii) pretreatment behavioral assessment; iii) blinded assessment of outcome; iv) assessment of ≥2 outcomes; v) compliance with animal welfare regulations; vi) statement of a potential conflict of interest.…”

Promoting recovery from ischemic stroke

“…[108][109][110] Accordingly, meta-analyses of experimental studies could not confirm beneficial effects of CIMT on either infarct sizes or neurobehavioral scores. [111,112] However, despite questionable preclinical evidence, CIMT is still the most frequently investigated intervention for the rehabilitation of stroke patients. [113] The original CIMT paradigm includes three components: First, task-orientated practices with the paretic limb, e.g.…”

Searching evidences of stroke in animal models: a review of discrepancies

“…Several studies have shown that training of the animals before experiments reduces the infarct volume and improves functional recovery in animal models of stroke (34). Forced physical training and skilled reaching training were identified as the most effective training strategies.…”