Meta‐Analysis of the Effects of Forest Fragmentation on Interspecific Interactions

Abstract

Forest fragmentation dramatically alters species persistence and distribution and affects many ecological interactions among species. Recent studies suggest that mutualisms, such as pollination and seed dispersal, are more sensitive to the negative effects of forest fragmentation than antagonisms, such as predation or herbivory. We applied meta-analytical techniques to evaluate this hypothesis and quantified the relative contributions of different components of the fragmentation process (decreases in fragment size, edge effects, increased isolation, and habitat degradation) to the overall effect. The effects of fragmentation on mutualisms were primarily driven by habitat degradation, edge effects, and fragment isolation, and, as predicted, they were consistently more negative on mutualisms than on antagonisms. For the most studied interaction type, seed dispersal, only certain components of fragmentation had significant (edge effects) or marginally significant (fragment size) effects. Seed size modulated the effect of fragmentation: species with large seeds showed stronger negative impacts of fragmentation via reduced dispersal rates. Our results reveal that different components of the habitat fragmentation process have varying impacts on key mutualisms. We also conclude that antagonistic interactions have been understudied in fragmented landscapes, most of the research has concentrated on particular types of mutualistic interactions such as seed dispersal, and that available studies of interspecific interactions have a strong geographical bias (arising mostly from studies carried out in Brazil, Chile, and the United States).

Egg‐laying traits reflect shifts in dragonfly assemblages in response to different amount of tropical forest cover

“…There is considerable debate in ecology concerning the effects of land use changes, including vegetation loss and fragmentation on assemblage and community structure and function (e.g. Allan, ; Laurence et al ., ; Magrach et al ., ). Dragonflies have been used as a focal group in these debates (e.g.…”

Gall wasp community response to fragmentation of oak tree species: importance of fragment size and isolated trees

“…These changes could physiologically stress arboreal species in fragmented habitats, and cause trees to promote more frequent flowering, fruiting (Aldrich and Hamrick 1998), leaf production (Lovejoy et al 1986, Sundarapandian andSwamy 1999) and leaf shedding (Sizer and Tanner 1999). For example, Magrach et al (2014) indicated that some plant species show compensatory responses to habitat fragmentation involving demographic effects, and changes in plant defenses and regrowth rates. Alternatively, fragmentation may confer benefits; for example, isolated trees are free of competition from neighboring conspecifics or other species.…”

Empirical evaluation of the strength of interspecific competition in shaping small mammal communities in fragmented landscapes

“…Despite the extensive scientific literature measuring fragmentation-induced effects on species and communities (Fahrig 2003;Lindenmayer and Fischer 2006), the role of interspecific interactions in shaping fragmented populations is still far from clear (Amarasekare 2003;Magrach et al 2014). Several theoretical studies describe possible mechanisms regulating the coexistence or exclusion of species in modified landscapes, but empirical confirmation is limited and based on indirect inference (Chesson 2000;Amarasekare 2003;Boeye et al 2014).…”