2008
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the effects of health promotion intervention in the workplace on depression and anxiety symptoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
128
2
16

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
128
2
16
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the association between well-being and employer outcomes, studies have found that overall well-being and its subdomains can be improved through individual interventions that target these elements of well-being, [30][31][32][33] and well-being-related interventions have been linked directly to improved employer outcomes such as health care cost and utilization, [34][35][36] disability leave, 37,38 absenteeism, 31,39 and presenteeism, 40 as well as employee turnover intentions. 41,42 Although it has been established that well-being improvement is attainable through individual intervention, no study to date has examined the connection between overall wellbeing change and outcomes change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In line with the association between well-being and employer outcomes, studies have found that overall well-being and its subdomains can be improved through individual interventions that target these elements of well-being, [30][31][32][33] and well-being-related interventions have been linked directly to improved employer outcomes such as health care cost and utilization, [34][35][36] disability leave, 37,38 absenteeism, 31,39 and presenteeism, 40 as well as employee turnover intentions. 41,42 Although it has been established that well-being improvement is attainable through individual intervention, no study to date has examined the connection between overall wellbeing change and outcomes change.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Van der Klink and colleagues (27) observed the strongest effects for anxiety symptoms and the weakest for depressive symptoms. Similarly, Martin and colleagues (25) found that different types of interventions had a positive but small effect on depressive symptoms, which leaves room for improvement in terms of the design of effective treatments to reduce depression in a workplace setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to internet-based interventions, traditional in-person stress management interventions have much stronger evidence, as demonstrated in several reviews and meta-analyses (25)(26)(27). When designing internet interventions for employees, some challenges and findings from this field should be considered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…type of intervention, intervention content and outcome categories [4,5]. In a systematic review Martin et al [6] found overall small positive effects in pooled data of 17 studies, investigating whether different types of health promotion interventions in the workplace reduce depression (standardized mean difference [SMD]=0.28, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.44) and anxiety (SMD=0.29, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.51). A systematic review and meta-analysis from 2014 identified 9 workplace-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed at reducing the level of depression symptoms, pooled effect size estimates from a random effects model showed the interventions to be superior to the control groups by a small positive effect (SMD=0.16, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.24) [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%