2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gim.2023.100896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of the diagnostic and clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing in pediatric and adult patients with rare diseases across diverse populations

Claudia C.Y. Chung,
Shirley P.Y. Hue,
Nicole Y.T. Ng
et al.
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 180 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…discovered a new genetic diagnosis in 22%, 16 although many patients exhibited only minimal symptoms of their diagnosis. In other studies of adult patients with suspicion for a genetic diagnosis, 14,15,1719 the diagnostic rate of exome sequencing has been reported to range from 14-29% – lower than that observed in the pediatric population, 25 but high enough to demonstrate the utility of broad genetic testing approaches in adults. The diagnostic rate of 24% that we report in our study is in keeping with these previous reports, despite the fact that the population we examined was not specifically selected for suspicion of genetic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…discovered a new genetic diagnosis in 22%, 16 although many patients exhibited only minimal symptoms of their diagnosis. In other studies of adult patients with suspicion for a genetic diagnosis, 14,15,1719 the diagnostic rate of exome sequencing has been reported to range from 14-29% – lower than that observed in the pediatric population, 25 but high enough to demonstrate the utility of broad genetic testing approaches in adults. The diagnostic rate of 24% that we report in our study is in keeping with these previous reports, despite the fact that the population we examined was not specifically selected for suspicion of genetic disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Participation was limited to individuals with signs or symptoms indicative of a RGD, consistent with current professional guidelines and prior large RGD population investigations, and limited access to molecular testing. 7,9,14,15 Cohort characteristics A total of 1,004 individuals from 981 families received cGS testing through the iHope program from June 2016 through September 2021 (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1), thirty-four percent (345/1004) of which were from LMIC sites including Mexico (209), Peru (89), the Democratic Republic of Congo (35), Ghana (9) and individual cases from Romania (1), Brazil (1) and India (1) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic yield of cGS across the cohort was comparable to similar studies in genetically and phenotypically diverse cohorts but was increased in LMIC compared to HIC patients. 7,8,14 Some of this difference may be explained by differential test utilization as patients from HIC sites were 6.6times more likely than patients from LMIC sites to have had at least one prior genetic test, suggesting that cGS in the LMIC population was more often utilized as a rst-line test, potentially in patients with more severe phenotypic presentations. This hypothesis is supported by cGS detection of an increased number and size of copy number variants in the LMIC population, which may have been identi ed by chromosomal microarray or karyotype if otherwise available.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, receiving a negative or inconclusive genetic test result is not uncommon. Deep phenotyping has been demonstrated an important role in improving diagnostic yield [ 26 30 ]. Physicians specialized in relevant field are recommended to participate in the pre-testing phenotyping, collaborating and communicating under an MDT framework, to provide accurate phenotypic description.…”
Section: The Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%