2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.11.134
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis of Pterional Versus Supraorbital Keyhole Approach for Clipping Intracranial Aneurysms: Direct Comparison of Approach-Related Complications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the results show a significantly shorter length of ICU stay in the SOMC group, when only patients without complications during the pre-or postoperative period were analyzed, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.71), and, for this reason, the chosen craniotomy technique did not alter length of ICU stay during the postoperative period or the length of total hospital stay (p = 0.36). This result was different from the one found by Xin et al 23 , who showed a shorter length of hospital stay in the SOMC group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the results show a significantly shorter length of ICU stay in the SOMC group, when only patients without complications during the pre-or postoperative period were analyzed, no significant difference was found between the two groups (p = 0.71), and, for this reason, the chosen craniotomy technique did not alter length of ICU stay during the postoperative period or the length of total hospital stay (p = 0.36). This result was different from the one found by Xin et al 23 , who showed a shorter length of hospital stay in the SOMC group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This study's results were similar to those found in a recent meta-analysis 23 in relation to the rate of complete aneurysm occlusion and chance of intraoperative rupture, with no significant differences between the two groups. Yu et al 18 also found no differences in relation to the rate of intraoperative rupture between the two groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that keyhole is not only the pursuit of small bone window, but the bone window that is suitable for the patient and has the least damage to the patient under su cient preoperative evaluation (CTA, CT, etc.). A previous meta-analysis of this group proved that the supraorbital lateral keyhole approach is safe and effective, which can reduce the length of hospital stay and reduce the probability of postoperative infection [7]. Statistics show that there is no signi cant difference in mortality and postoperative complications between supraorbital lateral keyhole approach and pterional approach[8] [9], and this approach can avoid supraorbital nerve, frontal branch of facial nerve, super cial temporal artery and other structures and reduce iatrogenic injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 17 Fischer et al, in 2011, compared different types of keyhole with pterional approach and reported comparable outcome. 18 While some comparative studies 19 20 21 have shown shorter operative time, better cosmetic outcome, less blood loss, lower craniotomy complications with keyhole approach, few studies 22 23 have cautioned on higher procedural complications and intraoperative rupture with keyhole among ruptured aneurysms. In a curious comparison of the keyhole and pterional approaches on opposite sides in the same set of patients, Park et al noted better cosmesis and satisfaction scores on the side of the keyhole but without any details on procedural complications.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%