2021
DOI: 10.1111/2041-210x.13678
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta‐analysis of primary producer amino acid δ15N values and their influence on trophic position estimation

Abstract: Methods in Ecology and EvolutionThis article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 140 publications
(223 reference statements)
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the consistency in trophic AA and source AA δ 15 N, an AA‐based TP (TP AA ) equation was developed from a bulk SIR‐based TP equation, as shown in Figure 5a (Chikaraishi et al, 2009 ). The TP AA is a transformative approach of trophic AA δ 15 N for consumer that is internally indexed to baseline component (or nutritional resource) with source AA δ 15 N variable (Kjeldgaard et al, 2021 ; McMahon & McCarthy, 2016 ; Ohkouchi et al, 2017 ; Ramirez et al, 2021 ). It is applicable for whole bodies (or any proteinaceous tissue types) from environmental samples to zooplankton and higher trophic‐level fish and apex predators (Cherel et al, 2019 ; Choi & Shin, 2021 ; Choi et al, 2020 ; Germain et al, 2013 ; Laiz‐Carrión et al, 2019 ; Mompean et al, 2016 ; Richards et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Common Use Of Aa δ 15 N and Aa δ ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the consistency in trophic AA and source AA δ 15 N, an AA‐based TP (TP AA ) equation was developed from a bulk SIR‐based TP equation, as shown in Figure 5a (Chikaraishi et al, 2009 ). The TP AA is a transformative approach of trophic AA δ 15 N for consumer that is internally indexed to baseline component (or nutritional resource) with source AA δ 15 N variable (Kjeldgaard et al, 2021 ; McMahon & McCarthy, 2016 ; Ohkouchi et al, 2017 ; Ramirez et al, 2021 ). It is applicable for whole bodies (or any proteinaceous tissue types) from environmental samples to zooplankton and higher trophic‐level fish and apex predators (Cherel et al, 2019 ; Choi & Shin, 2021 ; Choi et al, 2020 ; Germain et al, 2013 ; Laiz‐Carrión et al, 2019 ; Mompean et al, 2016 ; Richards et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Common Use Of Aa δ 15 N and Aa δ ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offset between δ 15 N Glx and δ 15 N Phe values (i.e., β value) is significantly different in plants performing C 3 (~ − 8.4‰) versus C 4 (~ 0.4‰) photosynthesis 20 , although substantial variation also exists among C 3 plants (e.g., ranging from − 2.6‰ in Urtica doica to − 12.2‰ in Sambucus nigra) depending on the degree of vascularization 28 and amount of lignin produced by the plant species 27 . Mammalian herbivores, whether feeding on C 3 or C 4 resources, however, do not differ significantly in ∆δ 15 N Glx − δ 15 N Phe values (p-value = 0.77, SI Dataset).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the equation relies on the assumption that the β value (isotopic differences between glutamate and phenylalanine ["big delta" Δ] in primary producers) and the TDF ( 15 N-enrichment of glutamate relative to phenylalanine per trophic level change [Δ Glx − Δ Phe ]) are both constant across all organisms within an ecosystem. For terrestrial ecosystems, β values of − 8.4‰ and − 0.4‰ are considered representative of C 3 and C 4 plant-dominated ecosystems, respectively 20,27 ; however, a recent meta-analysis of β values, demonstrated considerably more variation than currently acknowledged 28 . On the other hand, a standard TDF value of 7.6‰ has been used to calculate trophic positions of all consumers, whether terrestrial or aquatic, modern or extinct, vertebrate or invertebrate, yet its assumption of constancy has only been tested on marine invertebrates, fishes, birds, insects, and heterotrophic bacteria, where it is also known to vary 16,20,[29][30][31] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…toward improving trophic position assessments via CSIA-AA (e.g., Ohkouchi et al, 2017;Ishikawa, 2018;Ramirez et al, 2021).…”
Section: Challenges In the Determination Of Trophic Positionsmentioning
confidence: 99%