2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01601.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of phenotypic selection on flowering phenology suggests that early flowering plants are favoured

Abstract: Flowering times of plants are important life-history components and it has previously been hypothesized that flowering phenologies may be currently subject to natural selection or be selectively neutral. In this study we reviewed the evidence for phenotypic selection acting on flowering phenology using ordinary and phylogenetic meta-analysis. Phenotypic selection exists when a phenotypic trait co-varies with fitness; therefore, we looked for studies reporting an association between two components of flowering … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

21
289
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 262 publications
(328 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
21
289
7
Order By: Relevance
“…This lack of constraint is consistent with a negligible correlation between timing of germination and flowering found in earlier work using a variance component approach ( r A  = −0.029, equivalent to r Total , Galloway et al., 2009). Selection in natural populations frequently favors early flowering (Austen, Rowe, Stinchcombe, & Forrest, 2017; Munguía‐Rosas, Ollerton, Parra‐Tabla, & De‐Nova, 2011), a pattern expected to become increasingly common in warm climates (Anderson, Inouye, McKinney, Colautti, & Mitchell‐Olds, 2012), including in C. americana (Haggerty & Galloway, 2011). The ability to evolve early flowering, regardless of the pattern of selection on timing of germination, will enhance C. americana 's ability to respond to changing climates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This lack of constraint is consistent with a negligible correlation between timing of germination and flowering found in earlier work using a variance component approach ( r A  = −0.029, equivalent to r Total , Galloway et al., 2009). Selection in natural populations frequently favors early flowering (Austen, Rowe, Stinchcombe, & Forrest, 2017; Munguía‐Rosas, Ollerton, Parra‐Tabla, & De‐Nova, 2011), a pattern expected to become increasingly common in warm climates (Anderson, Inouye, McKinney, Colautti, & Mitchell‐Olds, 2012), including in C. americana (Haggerty & Galloway, 2011). The ability to evolve early flowering, regardless of the pattern of selection on timing of germination, will enhance C. americana 's ability to respond to changing climates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the analysis of both mean range shifts and shifts in southern range margins, the interaction term between climatic niche conservatism through phenological changes and perennation seemed to be influential, suggesting that annual species have a stronger link between spatial and temporal niche dynamics. Lifetime fitness in annual plants may be more affected by the flowering time in any particular year compared with perennial species, as their fitness relies on only one reproductive season, and flowering during times of favourable conditions may be a more critical issue [42]. This means that the selection on flowering time tends to be stronger in annual plants [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant flowering phenology is shaped by the interacting dynamics of both biotic and abiotic factors affecting species' fitness [14,40]. However, accumulated evidence has shown that advancing flowering time with warming maintains, or even increases, fitness [41], particularly in temperate regions [42], causing directional selection favouring earlier flowering [43]. Thus, the northward mean range shifts in species experiencing warming temperatures during flowering have presumably been caused by local extirpation of such species failing to advance their phenology sufficiently.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More often than not, fitness through male function is left unexamined. For example, just five of 87 studies reviewed in a recent meta-analysis of selection on flowering time considered any effect on male fitness [1]. Because selection through the two sexual functions can conceivably differ in intensity and direction [2], a focus on seed production alone can lead to a biased view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%