2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03281-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of medial-to-lateral versus lateral-to-medial colorectal mobilisation during laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Anastomotic leak in this meta-analysis was 2.5%, and 4.5% in our case. In this meta-analysis conversion to open surgery was 3.5%, the mean procedure time was 160.4 min, the mean length of hospital stay was 9.3 days, and the mean number of lymph nodes removed was n=17.2 (22). In our study, the conversion rate was 9.1%, median procedure time was 150 min, mean value of days of hospitalization was 6.89, and the number of removed lymph nodes was 16.95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anastomotic leak in this meta-analysis was 2.5%, and 4.5% in our case. In this meta-analysis conversion to open surgery was 3.5%, the mean procedure time was 160.4 min, the mean length of hospital stay was 9.3 days, and the mean number of lymph nodes removed was n=17.2 (22). In our study, the conversion rate was 9.1%, median procedure time was 150 min, mean value of days of hospitalization was 6.89, and the number of removed lymph nodes was 16.95.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In the meta-analysis of Hajibandeh et al eight comparative studies were evaluated with a total of 1477 patients (626 with medial-to-lateral and 851 lateral-to-medial approach in laparoscopic colorectal surgery) (22).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in a typical laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer, considering the safeness and oncological aspects, lymphadenectomy and division of vessels were often performed prior to mesenteric dissection with the no-touch isolation technique using conventional medial-to-lateral approach [7]. But the impact of conventional medial approach on overall survival is still controversial [11][12][13]. These data support the extracorporeal mesocolon dissection-first approach as a safer and more applicable approach than the conventional one.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One meta-analysis showed that the lateral-to-medial approach during laparoscopic colorectal resection might increase procedure time, length of hospital stays, and conversion rate. 29 Some surgeons introduced different surgical techniques of splenic flexure mobilization with the medial-to-lateral method, 23 , 30 , 31 but the sample size was limited. In advance, we are the first to show an efficient and safe way to identify the hotspot, entering the lesser sac, and preserving the pancreas from mesocolon securely by the FACT method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%