2009
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1215053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for tumors of the gastrointestinal tract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
239
2
11

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 367 publications
(257 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
239
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…108 This is mostly a problem in the stomach; the mean rate of post procedural bleeding across five recent large studies (>6000 patients in total) of gastric ESD was 5.8% (range 3.6-6.9%). 30 109-113 Nevertheless, severe consequences were rare (1 death, 3 angiographic interventions, and no surgery).…”
Section: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…108 This is mostly a problem in the stomach; the mean rate of post procedural bleeding across five recent large studies (>6000 patients in total) of gastric ESD was 5.8% (range 3.6-6.9%). 30 109-113 Nevertheless, severe consequences were rare (1 death, 3 angiographic interventions, and no surgery).…”
Section: Endoscopic Submucosal Dissectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was developed for early gastric cancer to obtain en bloc material while causing less local recurrent disease (12,13). Despite the technical difficulties (14), ESD enables the operator to achieve an en bloc resection regardless of the tumor size for esophageal and colorectal neoplasia (15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the lesions indicated for ESD are larger than those indicated for endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), the surgical duration is often longer [21,22] and the artificial ulcers that form after ESD tend to be larger [12]. Therefore, the effect of thermocoagulation is expected to be greater than that of EMR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%