Abstract:AIM:To review the literature on capsule endoscopy (CE) for detecting esophageal varices using conventional esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) as the standard.
METHODS:A strict literature search of studies comparing the yield of CE and EGD in patients diagnosed or suspected as having esophageal varices was conducted by both computer search and manual search. Data were extracted to estimate the pooled diagnostic sensitivity and specificity.
RESULTS:There were seven studies appropriate for meta-analysis in our stud… Show more
“…Also, as in the Choe et al [21] study, we found that concordance rates on grading esophageal varices were excellent at 95% (κ = 0.91). These results are better than those reported by using endoscopy capsule for detection of esophageal varices [7][8][9] . With regards to erosive esophagitis diagnosed at upper endoscopy, E.G.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Several studies have shown that ECE is safe and has an acceptable accuracy for the evaluation of esophageal varices and can be used as an alternative to EGD for the screening of portal hypertension, especially in patients unable or unwilling to undergo EGD [7,9] . Unsedated small-caliber transnasal esophagoscopy offers the possibility of efficient and accurate endoscopic assessment of the esophagus, with less cost and fewer risks compared with sedated upper endoscopy, and can be used as a method to screen for esophageal disease in a primary care population [11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, several noninvasive or minimally invasive methods have been proposed as alternatives to conventional EGD for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) and ultra-thin small caliber esophagoscopes [7][8][9][10][11][12] . Several studies have shown that ECE is safe and has an acceptable accuracy for the evaluation of esophageal varices and can be used as an alternative to EGD for the screening of portal hypertension, especially in patients unable or unwilling to undergo EGD [7,9] .…”
AIM:To assess feasibility of unsedated esophagoscopy using a small-caliber disposable transnasal esophagoscopy and to compare its accuracy with standard endoscopy.
METHODS:We prospectively included subjects who were referred for upper endoscopy. All subjects underwent transnasal endoscopy with E.G. Scan™. The disposable probe has a 3.6 mm gauge and at its distal end there is a 6 mm optical capsule, with a viewing angle of 125°. Patients underwent conventional endoscopy after the completion of E.G. Scan™. We describe the findings detected by the E.G. Scan™ and calculate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Kappa index for esophageal diagnosis.
RESULTS:A total of 96 patients (54 women), mean age of 50.12 years (14 to 79), were evaluated. In all cases we were able to perform esophagoscopy with E.G.Scan™. The average realization time was 5 min. A total of 58 alterations were detected in the esophagus, 49 gastric abnormalities and 13 duodenal abnormalities. We found that for esophageal varices, E.G. Scan™ has sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, 97% and 97%, respectively. Kappa coefficients were 0.32 for hiatal hernia, 0.409 for erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, 0.617 for Barrett's esophagus, and 0.909 for esophageal varices.
CONCLUSION:Esophagoscopy with E.G. Scan™ is a well-tolerated, fast and safe procedure. It has an appropriate diagnostic accuracy for esophageal varices when compared with conventional endoscopy.
“…Also, as in the Choe et al [21] study, we found that concordance rates on grading esophageal varices were excellent at 95% (κ = 0.91). These results are better than those reported by using endoscopy capsule for detection of esophageal varices [7][8][9] . With regards to erosive esophagitis diagnosed at upper endoscopy, E.G.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…Several studies have shown that ECE is safe and has an acceptable accuracy for the evaluation of esophageal varices and can be used as an alternative to EGD for the screening of portal hypertension, especially in patients unable or unwilling to undergo EGD [7,9] . Unsedated small-caliber transnasal esophagoscopy offers the possibility of efficient and accurate endoscopic assessment of the esophagus, with less cost and fewer risks compared with sedated upper endoscopy, and can be used as a method to screen for esophageal disease in a primary care population [11][12][13][14][15] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last years, several noninvasive or minimally invasive methods have been proposed as alternatives to conventional EGD for the diagnosis of esophageal diseases, such as esophageal capsule endoscopy (ECE) and ultra-thin small caliber esophagoscopes [7][8][9][10][11][12] . Several studies have shown that ECE is safe and has an acceptable accuracy for the evaluation of esophageal varices and can be used as an alternative to EGD for the screening of portal hypertension, especially in patients unable or unwilling to undergo EGD [7,9] .…”
AIM:To assess feasibility of unsedated esophagoscopy using a small-caliber disposable transnasal esophagoscopy and to compare its accuracy with standard endoscopy.
METHODS:We prospectively included subjects who were referred for upper endoscopy. All subjects underwent transnasal endoscopy with E.G. Scan™. The disposable probe has a 3.6 mm gauge and at its distal end there is a 6 mm optical capsule, with a viewing angle of 125°. Patients underwent conventional endoscopy after the completion of E.G. Scan™. We describe the findings detected by the E.G. Scan™ and calculate the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and Kappa index for esophageal diagnosis.
RESULTS:A total of 96 patients (54 women), mean age of 50.12 years (14 to 79), were evaluated. In all cases we were able to perform esophagoscopy with E.G.Scan™. The average realization time was 5 min. A total of 58 alterations were detected in the esophagus, 49 gastric abnormalities and 13 duodenal abnormalities. We found that for esophageal varices, E.G. Scan™ has sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 95%, 97% and 97%, respectively. Kappa coefficients were 0.32 for hiatal hernia, 0.409 for erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease, 0.617 for Barrett's esophagus, and 0.909 for esophageal varices.
CONCLUSION:Esophagoscopy with E.G. Scan™ is a well-tolerated, fast and safe procedure. It has an appropriate diagnostic accuracy for esophageal varices when compared with conventional endoscopy.
“…A meta-analysis of seven studies verified that CE has acceptable sensitivity and specificity (85.8% and 80.5%, respectively) in detecting esophageal varices [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
This study indicates that discriminating EV size by the current capsule scale is unreliable. Lowering the grading threshold improved the ability to discriminate EV size by CE. In the proper context, CE is an alternative to EGD to screen for EV.
“…A recent meta-analysis of seven studies involving 446 patients, ECE was found to have a sensitivity of 86 % and specificity 81 % in detecting esophageal varices (Fig. 2.12) [30].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.