2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0051571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis of 125 Rheumatoid Arthritis-Related Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms Studied in the Past Two Decades

Abstract: ObjectiveCandidate gene association studies and genome-wide association studies (GWAs) have identified a large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) loci affecting susceptibility to rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, for the same locus, some studies have yielded inconsistent results. To assess all the available evidence for association, we performed a meta-analysis on previously published case-control studies investigating the association between SNPs and RA.MethodsTwo hundred and sixteen studies, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To evaluate the heterogeneity of between-and within-study variation, Cochran's Q test was employed [Huedo-Medina et al, 2006] (p < 0.1). To measure the degree of inconsistency across studies another indicator of heterogeneity called I 2 was used where values of this variable greater than 25%, 50% or 75% indicated low-, mid-or high-grade heterogeneity respectively [Jin et al, 2009;Bedi et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2012;Vyas et al, 2013]. Visual inspection of funnel plots were performed to ascertain publication bias [Begg and Mazumdar, 1994;Egger et al, 1997].…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of the Significant Snps In Asian Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the heterogeneity of between-and within-study variation, Cochran's Q test was employed [Huedo-Medina et al, 2006] (p < 0.1). To measure the degree of inconsistency across studies another indicator of heterogeneity called I 2 was used where values of this variable greater than 25%, 50% or 75% indicated low-, mid-or high-grade heterogeneity respectively [Jin et al, 2009;Bedi et al, 2011;Jiang et al, 2012;Vyas et al, 2013]. Visual inspection of funnel plots were performed to ascertain publication bias [Begg and Mazumdar, 1994;Egger et al, 1997].…”
Section: Meta-analysis Of the Significant Snps In Asian Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to fixed-effects model, SMR of lung cancer for TCDDexposed population was 1.12 (95%CI: 1.01-1.27) and significantly increased (Kogevinas et al, 1997;t Mannetje et al, 2005;McBride et al, 2009;Jiang et al, 2012). When focused on the latency of CPsR exposure (Fingerhut et al, 1991;Becher et al, 1996;Ramlow et al, 1996;McBride et al, 2009) and lung cancer diagnosis, SMR for over 20 years latency was 1.38 (95%CI; 1.06-1.78; p=0.01) where as other groups represent any increased risk for lung cancer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Funnel plots were used to evaluate the potential publication bias [40]. Begg's and Egger's tests were used to evaluate the asymmetry of the funnel plot [40].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Begg's and Egger's tests were used to evaluate the asymmetry of the funnel plot [40]. It is assumed that in the absence of publication bias, the largest study will be plotted near the average, and smaller studies will be spread evenly on both sides of the average, creating a roughly funne-shaped distribution.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%