Meta-Analysis in Renal Denervation – Or How to Compare Apples With Oranges?

Mahfoud, Felix; Götzinger, Felix

doi:10.1016/j.carrev.2021.10.013

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Все выборки работ, собранных в обзорах и метаанализах от 2008-2021г, практически одинаковы, объединяя для столь мультифакторных патологий, как БСК [2,10,11], перечисленные выше заведомо необъединяемые облученные группы. Распространенный научный мем при критике подобных "метаанализов" -"объединение яблок с апельсинами" [17]. В этих выборках практически отсутствуют контингенты, подвергавшиеся лучевому воздействию только в диапазонах малых доз -верхние границы величины экспозиции почти всегда достигают средних и даже больших доз, а единичные исключения или характеризуются обратными эффектами, или просто не интерпретируемы [8,13,14] (и др.).…”

Section: ординальная шкала диапазонов доз радиацииunclassified

Low-dose ionizing radiation as a factor increasing cardiovascular mortality: is there a risk from multiple computed tomographies in the context of COVID-19 pandemic?

Koterov

Ushenkova

2022

Russ J Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The review aim was to familiarize biomedical professionals with the latest evidence-based data on the effect of sparsely ionizing radiation (X-ray, γ- and β-radiation) on cardiovascular mortality (ICD-9: 390-459; ICD-10: I00-I99), which is especially important during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic due to the increased use of computed tomography (CT) and X-ray procedures. Information is presented on the officially accepted range of radiation doses (very low doses — 0-0,01 Gy, low doses — 0,01-0,1 Gy, moderate doses — 0,1- 1,0 Gy, high doses — over 1 Gy). The evolution of ideas about the effects of radiation on the prevalence of cardiovascular diseases is discussed: from high and very high doses to the declaration in recent years of the possible effect of low doses. The statements from the documents of authoritative radiation organizations (UNSCEAR, ICRP, NCRP, EPA, etc.) are given, according to which the threshold for increasing cardiovascular mortality is 0,5 Gy (range of moderate doses), and there are no epidemiological justifications for the effects of low doses. According to a data for six countries, the maximum cumulative doses from multiple CT scans for COVID-19 diagnosis are one order less than the threshold dose, and the average cumulative doses are two orders less. Data on the absence or low risk of cancer after CT for this reason are also presented.

show abstract

Section: ординальная шкала диапазонов доз радиацииunclassified

Low-dose ionizing radiation as a factor increasing cardiovascular mortality: is there a risk from multiple computed tomographies in the context of COVID-19 pandemic?

Koterov

Ushenkova

2022

Russ J Cardiol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Meta-Analysis in Renal Denervation – Or How to Compare Apples With Oranges?

Cited by 1 publication

References 17 publications

Low-dose ionizing radiation as a factor increasing cardiovascular mortality: is there a risk from multiple computed tomographies in the context of COVID-19 pandemic?

Low-dose ionizing radiation as a factor increasing cardiovascular mortality: is there a risk from multiple computed tomographies in the context of COVID-19 pandemic?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About