Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis

Li, Cheng; Ojeda-Thies, Cristina; Xu, Chi; Trampuž, Andrej

doi:10.1186/s13018-020-01757-9

Cited by 24 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 73 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Web of Science is the most frequently used database in bibliometric studies, and most of the bibliometric softwares could identify the format from Web of Science [ 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. However, the drawback is that some valuable literature from other database sources are most likely missed [ 13 ]. Second, the research topic of ERAS contains multiple medical disciplines.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Scientific publication is the core of discipline development and scholarly communication, and the creation of clinical practice guidelines also depends on the strong evidence from the literature [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. Bibliometric analysis is a method for discovering the characteristics of a research subject to understand the current status and trend through the literature, and it is commonly used in the medical field [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 ]. Unfortunately, as one of the hot topics in the surgical field, ERAS has not been assessed.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The Pertinent Literature of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: A Bibliometric Approach

Cheng

Zhao

et al. 2021

Medicina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and Objectives: The programs of enhanced recovery after surgery are the new revolution in surgical departments; however, features of this concept have not been systematically explored. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS)-related research using bibliometric analysis. Materials and Methods: The search strategy of ERAS programs was conducted in the Web of Science database. Bibliometric analysis was further performed by Excel and Bibliometrix software. The relationship between citation counts and Mendeley readers was assessed by linear regression analysis. Results: 8539 studies from 1994–2019 were included in the present research, with reporting studies originating from 91 countries using 18 languages. The United States (US) published the greatest number of articles. International cooperation was discovered in 82 countries, with the most cooperative country being the United Kingdom. Henrik Kehlet was found to have published the highest number of studies. The journal Anesthesia and Analgesia had the largest number of articles. Linear regression analysis presented a strong positive correlation between citations and Mendeley readers. Most research was related to gastrointestinal surgery in this field. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis shows the current status of ERAS programs from multiple perspectives, and it provides reference and guidance to scholars for further research.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Pertinent Literature of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: A Bibliometric Approach

Cheng

Zhao

et al. 2021

Medicina

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The present study had several limitations. First, our bibliometric analysis was based on the WoS database, which potentially missed several publications from frequently used databases, such as Scopus and PubMed [ 38 , 39 ]. Second, conference proceedings were excluded in the present study, as they could be published twice as a conference abstract and complete journal article [ 40 , 41 ].…”

Section: Limitationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical application of robotic orthopedic surgery: a bibliometric study

Wang

Perka

et al. 2021

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The present study aimed to evaluate the status and trends of robotic orthopedic surgery in a clinical setting using bibliometrics. Methods All relevant publications on the clinical use of robotic surgery in orthopedics were searched from the Web of Science database. Subsequently, data were analyzed using bibliometrics. Visualizing data of bibliographic coupling, co-citation, and co-occurrence analysis were performed using VOSviewer. Results In total, 224 clinical studies met the included standards between 2000 to 2019. Global publications presented an increasing annual trend, with the United States found to have the largest number of publications and robotic companies active in the field (n = 99), followed by China (n = 38), and the United Kingdom (n = 27). The institution with the most contributions was the Beijing Jishuitan Hospital in China (n = 15). The most productive scholars were Tian Wei and Mont Michael A, with 14 publications each. The top 30 most cited papers list showed 29 publications to be cited on more than 40 occassions. The journal with the most related and influential publications on robotic orthopedic surgery was the Journal of Arthroplasty. Fourteen types of robots were used, with the majority applied in knee and spinal surgery. MAKO was the most widely used robot in hip and knee surgery and Mazor in spinal surgery. Most studies were small sample populations of low-quality in this field. The top 20 most frequently used keywords were identified from 950 author keywords. Research on orthopedic robots were classified into two clusters by co-occurrence networks: spinal-related robotic surgery and joint-related robotic surgery. Conclusions The present bibliometric study summarizes the clinical research of orthopedic robots on study type, sample size, type of surgery, robot information, surgical site, most popular keywords, most cited papers, journals, authors, institutions, and countries. These findings may assist the scholars better understand the current status and research trends to guide future practice and directions.

show abstract

“…Bibliometrics, first defined by Pritchard in 1969, is a visualization method to quantitatively assess the contribution of a research field by using mathematical and statistical approaches [ 8 ]. It is also regarded as an important approach to reveal the research trends and predict the research hotspots in a certain field [ 9 , 10 ]. Over recent years, the application of bibliometric analysis is very extensive in the biomedical sciences, due to the explosion in the quantity of scientific publications and the availability of several freeware bibliometric tools [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge structure and emerging trends on osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a bibliometric and visualized study

Cheng

Tong

et al. 2022

J Orthop Surg Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a common disabling disease with considerable social and economic impacts. Although extensive studies related to ONFH have been conducted in recent years, a specific bibliometric analysis on this topic has not yet been performed. Our study attempted to summarize the comprehensive knowledge map, development landscape, and future directions of ONFH research with the bibliometric approach. Methods All publications concerning ONFH published from 2001 to 2020 were identified from Web of Science Core Collection. Key bibliometric indicators were calculated and evaluated using CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and the online bibliometric analysis platform. Results A total of 2594 publications were included. Our analysis revealed a significant exponential growth trend in the annual number of publications over the past 20 years (R2 = 0.9663). China, the USA, and Japan were the major contributors both from the quality and quantity points of view. Correlation analysis indicated that there was a high positive correlation between the number of publications and gross domestic product (r = 0.774), and a moderate positive correlation between publications and demographic factor (r = 0.673). All keywords were categorized into four clusters including Cluster 1 (etiology and risk factors study); Cluster 2 (basic research and stem cell therapy); cluster 3 (hip-preserving study); and Cluster 4 (hip replacement study). Stem cell therapy-related research has been recognized as an important research hotspot in this field. Several topics including exosomes, autophagy, biomarkers, osteogenic differentiation, microRNAs, steroid-induced osteonecrosis, mesenchymal stem cells, double-blind, early-stage osteonecrosis, and asymptomatic osteonecrosis were considered as research focuses in the near future. Conclusion Over the past two decades, increasing attention has been paid to global ONFH-related research. Our bibliometric findings provide valuable information for researchers to understand the basic knowledge structure, identify the current research hotspots, potential collaborators, and future research frontiers in this field.

show abstract

Meta-analysis in periprosthetic joint infection: a global bibliometric analysis

Cited by 24 publications

References 73 publications

The Pertinent Literature of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: A Bibliometric Approach

The Pertinent Literature of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Programs: A Bibliometric Approach

Clinical application of robotic orthopedic surgery: a bibliometric study

Knowledge structure and emerging trends on osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a bibliometric and visualized study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About