2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.10.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analysis Comparing Outcomes With Bifurcation Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal that different stent strategies in the twostent technique may be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Consistent with this study, a meta-analysis of various randomized controlled trials on coronary bifurcation stent strategies reported that the TLR rate of the T-stent or TAP technique was higher than that of other techniques (16). In the DEFINITION II trial, which included 35% of patients with DM, the double kissing crush technique had a 1-year TLR rate, superior to that of the provisional stent group (14.5 %) using the T-stent or TAP technique for bailout stenting (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…To our knowledge, this is the first study to reveal that different stent strategies in the twostent technique may be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary bifurcation lesions. Consistent with this study, a meta-analysis of various randomized controlled trials on coronary bifurcation stent strategies reported that the TLR rate of the T-stent or TAP technique was higher than that of other techniques (16). In the DEFINITION II trial, which included 35% of patients with DM, the double kissing crush technique had a 1-year TLR rate, superior to that of the provisional stent group (14.5 %) using the T-stent or TAP technique for bailout stenting (17).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…[4] A recent meta-analysis including only randomized controlled trials reported no significant difference between 1-stent and 2-stent strategies. [8] The most recent randomized multicenter trial confirmed this result, indicating comparable primary and secondary outcomes in the 1-stent and 2-stent groups. [5] A definition for complex bifurcation lesions in the distal LMCA has been raised, including the variability of SB, and applied in PCI technique selection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…[7] However, parameters such as the lesion length and diameter of the SB could have a significant impact on technique selection and major cardiac events (MACEs). [8,9] In this meta-analysis, we reviewed existing randomized controlled trials comparing clinical outcomes after PCI with bifurcation lesions, providing evidence for bifurcation PCI technique selection and its influencing factors.…”
Section: What Are the Clinical Implications?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent meta-analysis showed that there was no difference in the risk for MACE up to 3 years between 1-and 2-stent approaches for PCI of bifurcation lesions. 14 The methodological foundation of this approach lies in the accuracy of outcome predictions for each modality of treatment, allowing personalized and individual predictions of the benefit of one treatment over another. 5,8 In the present study, the SS-2020 formally identified a cohort composed of 22.7% of patients in the randomized population who had bifurcation lesions and had a risk difference of <0 (ARD # 0%) in mortality between PCI and CABG (Central Illustration).…”
Section: Impact Of Bifurcation Lesions On All-causementioning
confidence: 99%