Meta-analysis and Planning of SIMTRAUMA: Medical Simulation for Combat Trauma

Abstract

REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 074-0188Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing this collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503 AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) REPORT DATE June 2000 REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVEREDFinal(12 May 99 -11 May 00) TITLE AND SUBTITLEMeta-Analysis and Planning of SIMTRAUMA: Medical Simulation for Combat Trauma Training AUTHORJS)Howard R. Champion Gerald A. Higgins PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES). SUPPLEMENTARY NOTESReport contains color graphics. 12a. DISTRIBUTION / AVAILABILITY STATEMENTApproved for PublicRelease; Distribution Unlimited 12b. DISTRIBUTION CODE ABSTRACT (Maximum 200 Words)An analysis of military use of non medical simulators has been carried out for the purpose of strategically directing the use of simulation in medicine. The United States Department of Defense has placed an increasing reliance on the use of simulators to train and sustain all manner of skills. This experience is documented by numerous studies attesting to the efficacy of trainers and the cost benefits of simulators. In addition, the range of skills to be trained is effectively broadened by the scope of situations that can be addressed by simulators and the accuracy with which performance can be measured.Technological advances make feasible the introduction of simulation into medicine with the potential for improved training at reduced cost and reduction of medical error. Important lessons need to be learned from the military simulation experience so that the most costeffective application of emerging technologies can be strategically sought for medical simulation. One area of particular benefit to the military medical domain will be substantial improvements in combat trauma readiness. A strategic plan for development of medical simulation in the military are advanced in the report. SUBJECT TERMSBiodefense, Neurotoxin _X_ Where copyrighted material is quoted, permission has been obtained to use such material (permission requested).Where material from documents designated for limited distribution is quoted, permission has been obtained to use the material.X Citations of commercial organizations and trade names in this report do not constitute an official Department of Army endorsement or approval of the products or services of these organizations. N/A In conducting research using animals, the investigator(s) adhered to the "Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals," prepa...

From the Combat Medic to the Forward Surgical Team: The Madigan Model for Improving Trauma Readiness of Brigade Combat Teams Fighting the Global War on Terror

“…In a meta-analysis for the Department of Defense, Champion and Higgins [11] explored whether incorporating medical simulation for combat trauma training was beneficial. Their study ultimately recommended hybrid technologic applications that include virtual environments, mannequins, and real world medical training for the optimal solution.…”

“…It was gratifying to observe their subsequent euphoria in being led through the successful implementation of the algorithm of direct pressure, pressure point, tourniquet, and application of a hemostatic dressing in which the saving of a "life" resulted. It is difficult to simulate this in an inanimate model [11].…”

Design and Development of a Surgical Skills Simulation Curriculum

“…The activity is smooth and coordinated, and attention can now be focused on the performance of other functions. Some investigators have argued that this three‐stage progression equates to the classic surgical training model of “see one, do one, teach one” [8].…”

“…Computer‐based simulators may also help alleviate some of the burden placed on human instructors during the associative phase of training in that the simulators are designed to offer proximate and terminal feedback that may not require a human presence. In fact, more advanced forms of shaping, such as adjusting the latency, programing in additional anatomical cues, or forcing trainees to deal with dangerous situations, which are rarely encountered in the real world—so called above‐real‐time training techniques—are more readily accomplished using partial‐task computer‐based simulators [8, 34]. Based on artificial intelligence, they can also be adapted to start the instructional process of fading as the learner’s skills improve.…”

Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition

“…A review of aviation training literature [24] suggests that irrelevant stimuli in a high-fidelity simulator can make task learning more difficult as the novice trainee had to learn to ignore these stimuli. As current surgical training simulators are low in fidelity with respect to their visual and task representation (i.e., using peas or graphical spheres to represent tissue), the addition of haptic feedback may be distracting for the novice trainee [25].…”