2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-016-0238-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta-Analyses of the Intra- and Interpersonal Outcomes of Interpersonal Coordination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
4
116
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although behavior matching was initially defined as the similarity of body postures between interactants (LaFrance, 1976), more recent literature has described such matching as behavioral mimicry (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999;Lakin, 2013;Vicaria & Dickens, 2016). Although behavior matching was initially defined as the similarity of body postures between interactants (LaFrance, 1976), more recent literature has described such matching as behavioral mimicry (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999;Lakin, 2013;Vicaria & Dickens, 2016).…”
Section: Coordination Mimicry and Synchronymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although behavior matching was initially defined as the similarity of body postures between interactants (LaFrance, 1976), more recent literature has described such matching as behavioral mimicry (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999;Lakin, 2013;Vicaria & Dickens, 2016). Although behavior matching was initially defined as the similarity of body postures between interactants (LaFrance, 1976), more recent literature has described such matching as behavioral mimicry (Chartrand & Bargh, 1999;Lakin, 2013;Vicaria & Dickens, 2016).…”
Section: Coordination Mimicry and Synchronymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have illustrated that such coordination contributes to smooth interactions and creates social bonds (Tickle-Degnen & Rosenthal, 1990). Recent meta-analyses have confirmed that the positive effects of coordination on interpersonal outcomes (e.g., prosocial behaviors and positive evaluations of interactions and partners) are robust (Vicaria & Dickens, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physical synchrony is an important nonverbal factor in forming and modulating communications 1 . Many studies have reported generally positive effects of physical synchrony on affective and cognitive aspects in communications [2][3][4] . Experimental manipulation of physical synchrony induced higher affiliation 5 , cooperation 6 , compassion and altruistic behaviour 7 , and coordination performance 8 , better mood 9 , and incidental memories 10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/top-down or unconscious/bottom-up processes. Previous psychological studies have provided indecisive evidence for the roles of awareness and intentionality factors3,4 . Although this study cannot provide a resolute conclusion on this issue, (a) the fact that participants confirmed to have been unaware of the true hypothesis in the debriefing after the experiment, and (b) the observation that among the three components of rapport, coordination, with cues that are complex and less available to conscious control than positivity and attentiveness cues56 , showed the greatest enhancing effect, suggest that the prior physical synchrony effect on the subsequent communication was mediated primarily via a bottom-up pathway.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%