2017
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2016.12.0470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meta‐Analyses of Biosolids Effect in Dryland Wheat Agroecosystems

Abstract: Land application to cropping systems is USEPA's preferred method of recycling biosolids. Determination of biosolids effect size through meta-analyses from two decades of field-location research at three sites should answer the question: Does 20 yr of biosolids application affect dryland wheat ( L.) grain production, grain nutrient concentrations, and soil elemental extractability compared with equivalent rates of commercial N fertilizer? At two sites, biennial biosolids application rates to a wheat-fallow (WF)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Overall effects of biosolids in dryland wheat agroecosystems. Barbarick et al (2017) performed meta-analyses on data collected from the Byers, CO, site (2001CO, site ( -2013 in conjunction with data collected from the "new" North Bennett, CO, site (1993CO, site ( -2013. The research premise was to understand whether biosolids application affects dryland wheat grain production and nutrient concentrations and available soil nutrients as compared with equivalent inorganic fertilizer applications.…”
Section: Byers Co Biosolids Land Application Research Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Overall effects of biosolids in dryland wheat agroecosystems. Barbarick et al (2017) performed meta-analyses on data collected from the Byers, CO, site (2001CO, site ( -2013 in conjunction with data collected from the "new" North Bennett, CO, site (1993CO, site ( -2013. The research premise was to understand whether biosolids application affects dryland wheat grain production and nutrient concentrations and available soil nutrients as compared with equivalent inorganic fertilizer applications.…”
Section: Byers Co Biosolids Land Application Research Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the presence of organic contaminants in biosolids, studies consistently note their minimal concentrations and the net bene t of land-application to soil and crop health (Prosser et al 2014; Barbarick et al 2017;Shahmohamadloo et al 2016), even when applied above conventional agronomic rates. Additionally, the use of biological test organisms in biosolids toxicity testing has expanded through the publication of government guidance documents and standardized operating protocols (SOPs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are exemptions to solely using organism for testing, particularly in measuring the bioaccumulation of hydrophobic compounds, which warrants biochemical assessment (Schmidt and Redshaw 2015;Wu et al 2015;Barbarick et al 2017). Regardless of the approach, whether using whole-organism endpoints or biochemical analysis, biosolids risk assessment has included many compounds including regulated (e.g., mercury) and unregulated inorganics (e.g., silver), steroids, brominated ame retardants (BFRs), silicones, and synthetic musks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation