1956
DOI: 10.1002/cite.330281006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Messung kleiner Dampfdrucke

Abstract: Die fur die Messung kleiner Dampfdrucke entwickelten Methoden und Gerate werden kritisch besprochen. Anschliei3end werden die Bedingungen diskutiert, um mit dem McLeod-Manometer kleine Dampfdrucke zu messen. Diese Bedingungen werden an Darnpfdruckmessungen irn Temperaturbereich zwischen 203 und etwa -looo C von Benzol, Thiophen, n-Butylbromid, 2.2.4-Trimethylpentan, Toluol, Tetrahydrothiophen, Propionitril und tert.-Arnylalkohol gepruft.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1960
1960
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solid EOS can describe the majority of the experimental sublimation pressures within a deviation of 5%, with only six points excepted. At temperatures below 220 K, the data from Milazzo, 105 Milazzo, 117 and Miljevic et al 118 differ from the calculated sublimation pressures by up to 10%; the small pressure values in this lowtemperature region are more difficult to fit with small relative differences. The auxiliary function generally matches the EOS calculations considering the data inconsistency and model uncertainties, except at temperatures below 195 K where no data exist.…”
Section: Vmmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The solid EOS can describe the majority of the experimental sublimation pressures within a deviation of 5%, with only six points excepted. At temperatures below 220 K, the data from Milazzo, 105 Milazzo, 117 and Miljevic et al 118 differ from the calculated sublimation pressures by up to 10%; the small pressure values in this lowtemperature region are more difficult to fit with small relative differences. The auxiliary function generally matches the EOS calculations considering the data inconsistency and model uncertainties, except at temperatures below 195 K where no data exist.…”
Section: Vmmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This value was used in the following calculations. The enthalpy of vaporization for this compound was determined by calorimetry, ,, from the temperature dependence of the saturated vapor pressure, , and by correlation-gas chromatography . When the Δ l g H m o (298.15 K) values were calculated from the vapor pressure data, the original p sat ( T ) data were fitted with the Clarke–Glew equation: R T nobreak.25em ln ( p sat p o ) = A T / θ B [ ( T / normalθ ) 1 ] C [ normalθ T + T nobreak.25em ln ( T / normalθ ) ] where θ = 298.15 K and p o = 1 bar.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enthalpies of fusion for BuBr determined by Timmermans and Deese differ by almost 1.5 times. The consistency of the enthalpies of vaporization and the saturated vapor pressures is good enough to use them for the evaluation of the standard entropy of vaporization for this compound at T = 298.15 K and, if the liquid-state entropy is known, the standard entropy of gaseous BuBr.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%