2012
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.199778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Messung der subjektiven Risikoeinstellung von Entscheidern: Existieren Methoden- und Personengruppenunterschiede?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reasons for not adapting DF practices could be the increased risk perception due to poor soil conditions, small farm sizes, or the particular risk attitude of the individual farmers (Antonides & Van Der Sar, 1990;Ramsey et al, 2019). Farmers differ in their risk attitudes, that is, some farmers are willing to accept more risk than others (Ewald et al, 2012;Menapace et al, 2016). Because the risk attitude impacts the potential adoption of DF practices (Sarwosri & Mußhoff, 2020;van Zonneveld et al, 2020), it is important to quantify farmers' risk attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reasons for not adapting DF practices could be the increased risk perception due to poor soil conditions, small farm sizes, or the particular risk attitude of the individual farmers (Antonides & Van Der Sar, 1990;Ramsey et al, 2019). Farmers differ in their risk attitudes, that is, some farmers are willing to accept more risk than others (Ewald et al, 2012;Menapace et al, 2016). Because the risk attitude impacts the potential adoption of DF practices (Sarwosri & Mußhoff, 2020;van Zonneveld et al, 2020), it is important to quantify farmers' risk attitudes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%