1943
DOI: 10.1007/bf01468818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Messung der reflektierten R�ntgenintensit�t in Abh�ngigkeit vom Grad der plastischen Verformung bei Metallen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1945
1945
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The kind of representation has become known and used as the Williamson–Hall plot (Williamson and Hall, 1953). The numbering in the figure means (1) aluminum filings (unpublished data by G. K. Williamson and W. H. Hall), (2) Cu filings (Brindley, 1940), (3) Cu filings (Stokes et al , 1943), (4, 5, 6) Cu sheet reduced to 20%, 60%, 99.5%, respectively (Dehlinger and Kochendoerfer, 1939; Dehlinger and Schäcke, 1943), (7, 8)
Figure 1.(a) Williamson-Hall plots of (1) aluminum filings (unpublished data by G. K. Williamson and W. H. Hall), (2, 3) Cu filings (Brindley, 1940; Stokes et al , 1943), (4, 5, 6) Cu sheet reduced to 20%, 60%, 99.5%, respectively (Dehlinger and Kochendoerfer, 1939; Dehlinger and Schäcke, 1943), (7, 8) Rhodium filings (Jaswon and Wheeler, 1948), and (9) Martensite rod (Jones and Sykes, 1937); (b) Wagner plot of ball-milled tungsten-carbide (Aqua and Wagner, 1966; Gillies and Lewis, 1968).
Rhodium filings (Jaswon and Wheeler, 1948), and (9) Martensite rod (Jones and Sykes, 1937).…”
Section: The Beginning Of X-ray Line Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The kind of representation has become known and used as the Williamson–Hall plot (Williamson and Hall, 1953). The numbering in the figure means (1) aluminum filings (unpublished data by G. K. Williamson and W. H. Hall), (2) Cu filings (Brindley, 1940), (3) Cu filings (Stokes et al , 1943), (4, 5, 6) Cu sheet reduced to 20%, 60%, 99.5%, respectively (Dehlinger and Kochendoerfer, 1939; Dehlinger and Schäcke, 1943), (7, 8)
Figure 1.(a) Williamson-Hall plots of (1) aluminum filings (unpublished data by G. K. Williamson and W. H. Hall), (2, 3) Cu filings (Brindley, 1940; Stokes et al , 1943), (4, 5, 6) Cu sheet reduced to 20%, 60%, 99.5%, respectively (Dehlinger and Kochendoerfer, 1939; Dehlinger and Schäcke, 1943), (7, 8) Rhodium filings (Jaswon and Wheeler, 1948), and (9) Martensite rod (Jones and Sykes, 1937); (b) Wagner plot of ball-milled tungsten-carbide (Aqua and Wagner, 1966; Gillies and Lewis, 1968).
Rhodium filings (Jaswon and Wheeler, 1948), and (9) Martensite rod (Jones and Sykes, 1937).…”
Section: The Beginning Of X-ray Line Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) Williamson-Hall plots of (1) aluminum filings (unpublished data by G. K. Williamson and W. H. Hall), (2, 3) Cu filings (Brindley, 1940; Stokes et al , 1943), (4, 5, 6) Cu sheet reduced to 20%, 60%, 99.5%, respectively (Dehlinger and Kochendoerfer, 1939; Dehlinger and Schäcke, 1943), (7, 8) Rhodium filings (Jaswon and Wheeler, 1948), and (9) Martensite rod (Jones and Sykes, 1937); (b) Wagner plot of ball-milled tungsten-carbide (Aqua and Wagner, 1966; Gillies and Lewis, 1968). …”
Section: The Beginning Of X-ray Line Profile Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%