Messenger ribonucleic acid for gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor and numbers of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors in ovariectomized ewes after hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection and treatment with estradiol

Estradiol-17beta (E2) is the major regulator of GnRH receptor (GnRHR) gene expression and number during the periovulatory period; however, the mechanisms underlying E2 regulation of the GNRHR gene remain undefined. Herein, we find that E2 conjugated to BSA (E2-BSA) mimics the stimulatory effect of E2 on GnRH binding in primary cultures of ovine pituitary cells. The time course for maximal GnRH analog binding was similar for both E2 and E2-BSA. The ability of E2 and E2-BSA to increase GnRH analog binding was blocked by the estrogen receptor (ER) antagonist ICI 182,780. Also, increased GnRH analog binding in response to E2 and the selective ESR1 agonist propylpyrazole triol was blocked by expression of a dominant-negative form of ESR1 (L540Q). Thus, membrane-associated ESR1 is the likely candidate for mediating E2 activation of the GNRHR gene. As cAMP response element binding protein (CREB) is an established target for E2 activation in gonadotrophs, we next explored a potential role for this protein as an intracellular mediator of the E2 signal. Consistent with this possibility, adenoviral-mediated expression of a dominant-negative form of CREB (A-CREB) completely abolished the ability of E2 to increase GnRH analog binding in primary cultures of ovine pituitary cells. Finally, the presence of membrane-associated E2 binding sites on ovine pituitary cells was demonstrated using a fluorescein isothiocyanate conjugate of E2-BSA. We suggest that E2 regulation of GnRHR number during the preovulatory period reflects a membrane site of action and may proceed through a nonclassical signaling mechanism, specifically a CREB-dependent pathway.

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 77%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Does a Nonclassical Signaling Mechanism Underlie an Increase of Estradiol-Mediated Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor Binding in Ovine Pituitary Cells?1

Davis

Whitesell

Cantlon

et al. 2011

“…We extend these observations by demonstrating that this rapid increase in tissue concentration of receptor is preceded by an even more acute increase in tissue levels of GnRH receptor mRNA. Estrogen-induced augmentation of GnRH receptor expression is evident in vitro [30,32] and in animal models in which hypothalamic inputs are negated immunologically [31] or by hypothalamo-pituitary disconnection [33,34]. These observations indicate that E 2 is acting directly at hypophyseal sites to increase GnRH receptor expression.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Effect of Stress-Like Concentrations of Cortisol on Estradiol-Dependent Expression of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Receptor in Orchidectomized Sheep1

Adams

Sakurai

Adams

1999

The effect of stress-like concentrations of cortisol (C) on estrogen-dependent expression of GnRH receptor was evaluated using orchidectomized sheep (wethers; n = 6 animals per group). C (5.0 mg/50 kg per hour; groups 1-4) or a comparable volume of vehicle (groups 5-8) was delivered by continuous infusion for 48 h. During the final 24 h of infusion, animals received concurrent infusion of estradiol (E2) at rates of 0 (groups 1 and 5), 0.5 (groups 2 and 6), 2.0 (groups 3 and 7), or 8.0 (groups 4 and 8) microg/50 kg per hour. Pituitary tissue was collected at the end of infusion. Although C did not affect (p > 0.05) the basal concentration of GnRH receptor or GnRH receptor mRNA, it reduced (p < 0.05) the increase in receptor and receptor mRNA induced by concurrent administration of 0. 5 microg E2/50 kg per hour. In contrast, the increase in GnRH receptor expression induced by higher levels of estrogen stimulation was not affected (p > 0.05) by concurrent administration of C. The effect of C on the temporal pattern of E2-dependent increase in GnRH receptor expression was assessed using wethers receiving E2 (0.5 microg/50 kg per hour) by continuous infusion for 0 (groups 1 and 5), 24 (groups 2 and 6), 48 (groups 3 and 7), or 72 h (groups 4 and 8). Animals received C (5.0 mg/50 kg per hour; groups 1-4) or vehicle (groups 5-8) beginning 24 h before, and continuing throughout, the E2 delivery period. Stress-like concentrations of C reduced (p < 0. 05) the increase in GnRH receptor and receptor mRNA induced after 24 h of E2 stimulation. However, the suppressive effect of C was transient, and tissue levels of GnRH receptor and receptor mRNA were comparable after 72 h of E2 infusion in animals receiving C or vehicle alone. Collectively these observations demonstrate that C suppresses estrogen-dependent increase in tissue concentrations of GnRH receptor and receptor mRNA. However, this effect of C is transient and not evident in animals receiving moderate to high levels of estrogen stimulation. This transient suppression of GnRH receptor expression may account, at least in part, for the anti-gonadal effect of glucocorticoids.

“…It has been well documented that the preovulatory surge of LH, observed after administration of E 2 , is the result of at least two components: an increase in the number of GnRH receptors in the pituitary gland [3,9,11,41], and a massive, prolonged release of GnRH from the hypothalamus [42][43][44][45]. If, as expected, conjugated forms of E 2 are not able to cross the blood-brain barrier, then they would be unable to induce a GnRH surge, which could account for the lack of preovulatory-like surge of LH.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Traditionally, the mechanism by which E 2 exerts its effects has been thought to occur exclusively through regulation of the transcription of target genes. For example, the stimulatory effect of E 2 on LH secretion occurs, at least in part, via an increase in the steadystate level of mRNA for GnRH receptors and number of GnRH receptors in the adenohypophysis [9][10][11], whereas the decrease in secretion of FSH is accompanied by an inhibition in transcription of the gene for the FSHb subunit [12,13]. In a wide variety of biological systems, however, E 2 has been shown to regulate cellular function by nongenomic actions initiated at the plasma membrane [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Nongenomic Action of Estradiol as the Mechanism Underlying the Acute Suppression of Secretion of Luteinizing Hormone in Ovariectomized Ewes1

Arreguin-Arevalo

Nett

2006

The objective of the present study was to determine how rapidly estradiol (E2) was able to suppress the secretion of LH in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes and to evaluate the ability of conjugated forms of E2 (E2 conjugated to BSA [1,3,5(10)-estratrien-3,17beta-diol-6-one-6-carboxymethyloxime:BSA [E2-BSA] and a novel conjugate, E2 conjugated to a small peptide [E2-PEP]) to mimic the actions of E2 on secretion of LH and FSH. Animals (n = 5-6 per group) were given infusions for 4 h of 50 microg of E2 or equimolar concentrations of E2-BSA or E2-PEP. Treatments with E2, E2-BSA, and E2-PEP each induced an acute suppression of LH secretion (<20 min, P < 0.01). In contrast, E2, but not E2-BSA or E2-PEP, induced the characteristic preovulatory-like surge of LH (at 10 h after priming treatment) and decreased secretion of FSH (at 4 h after priming treatment). In conclusion, the acute inhibition of LH secretion induced by E2 in OVX ewes supports the concept of a nongenomic action as the mechanism underlying the sudden suppression in secretion of LH. In addition, the fact that conjugated forms of E2 mimicked only the acute suppression of secretion of LH, without inducing the putative genomic actions on secretion of LH or FSH (i.e., a preovulatory-like surge), suggests that the acute effect of E2 may be mediated via the plasma membrane.