2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Messaging capabilities of V2I networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the emergency situation caused by the Covid-19, and the mobility restrictions in which it has been necessary to work in the time planned for these tests, it was not possible to have a scenario where the range could be tested better, limiting these tests to the 300 meters available, enough for I2V applications [15]. In this type of applications, the typical payload goes from 240 bits [9] to a range between 256 and 1024 bits [8,15] (between 30 and 128 bytes). This represents no more than 128 bytes.…”
Section: Testbed and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the emergency situation caused by the Covid-19, and the mobility restrictions in which it has been necessary to work in the time planned for these tests, it was not possible to have a scenario where the range could be tested better, limiting these tests to the 300 meters available, enough for I2V applications [15]. In this type of applications, the typical payload goes from 240 bits [9] to a range between 256 and 1024 bits [8,15] (between 30 and 128 bytes). This represents no more than 128 bytes.…”
Section: Testbed and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Bluetooth Communications as an I2V communications network has been analyzed in different scenarios, using Bluetooth 4.0 and connection-based communication [8]. In [9], Bluetooth 4.0 and Zigbee are compared for this type of applications, highlighting the greater stability of Zigbee, although it is a much less widespread technology than Bluetooth, with a lower range and speed [10]. A review of communication alternatives in V2X can be seen in [6].…”
Section: Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objective of the first tests, presented in [12], was to evaluate the performance of the protocol with the improvements introduced in version 5.x and to test its effectiveness in open environments, as well as to study the capacity of the advertisement mode to send useful application-level messages based on recommendations (range of 240 and 1024 bits (from 30 to 128 bytes)) [18,19]. The performance of these tests gave verification of very acceptable PDR (Packet Delivery Ratio) percentages up to 250 m distance, although, in the case of large messages of the application layer, a high fragmentation of these means that at these distances it is not possible to recompose more than 6% of the messages, even with LE_CODED coding.…”
Section: Scenarios and Test Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this point of view, the use of BLE as an I2V communication network has been analysed in different scenarios, using its 4.0 version but in a connection-based communication mode [18]. The work in [19] compares BLE 4.0 and Zigbee for this type of application, indicating the greater stability and robustness of Zigbee but highlighting that it is a much less widespread technology with a much shorter range and speed than BLE [20]. Nevertheless, these studies are focused on BLE connected mode and are not applicable for non-safety applications or I2V and I2P applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gheorghiu et al presented in [ 11 ] an analysis of the messaging requirements for automatic tolling, weigh in motion and/or automatic classification systems. The authors conducted tests using BLE modules placed in noisy Wi-Fi environments and compared the results observed for BLE and ZigBee communications, extending previous work presented in [ 12 ].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%