Message for Solidarity: A Japanese Perspective on the Payment for Forest Ecosystem Services Developed over Centuries of History

Abstract

Payments for ecosystem/environmental services (PES) have emerged internationally as a new environmental conservation concept over the past two decades. By contrast, Japan has a centuries-long history of using various forms of PES. These schemes can be understood as solutions to interregional problems with forest ecosystem services that have been agreed upon and accepted by the society. This paper aims to consider the significance of PES with respect to cooperative relationships by examining historically formed solutions in Japan. The Japanese experience shows that rather than simply being a demonstration of monetary value, PES in upstream forests were a means of communication across regions, expressing interregional solidarity as a core concept. As connections among communities became less visible, the government artificially created solidarity through payments. The payments gradually shifted from having a socioeconomic meaning to having a psychological meaning. The government sought to substantiate the sense of solidarity by making individual users more aware of the meaning of payments. We can find the significance of this type of PES in the fact that payments can be a way to approach the issue of building solidarity by focusing on the function of payments as messengers rather than them merely having an economic value.

Post-Restoration Forest Management Issues in East Asia under Climate Change: Based on the Special Issue “Economic and Societal Losses Due to Environmental Impacts on Forestry Productivity”

“…The government has also been zoning environmental and production forests and promoting final felling through clear cutting in production forests [19]. To promote these plans, a forest environment tax was introduced in 2018 [20]. Despite these initiatives, a recent report [21] highlighted that the road networks in forests, which are an essential production base for increasing forestry productivity, are inadequate, implying that more timber removal processes are required in Japan than in Central European countries with the same sloping forestry, and therefore, no immediate economic benefits can be expected.…”

Optimization of integrated watershed recovery: comparison of management systems in Japan and Indonesia

“…The reciprocal interaction between government and society with a division of focus, namely the government on a larger scale and local communities on a regional scale (Ohno et al, 2010). In terms of financing, Japan has implemented collaborative and cooperative payments for environmental services (PES), including the imposition of an agreed forest environmental tax in the form of fees for using community water downstream for forest conservation in the upstream watershed (Ishizaki & Matsuda, 2021). For example, the Waterworks Bureau allocates JPY 1/m3 of water (JPY 0.5 of water fee revenue and JPY 0.5 of the city budget) as a watershed-based partnership fund with local water supply areas.…”