2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02906648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesozoic-Cenozoic tectonic transition in Kuqa Depression-Tianshan, Northwest China: Evidence from sandstone detrital and geochemical records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Integrated analyses of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic depositional systems, sandstone framework grains, detrital heavy minerals and whole sandstones geochemical compositions from the Kuqa Subbasin (Li et al , 2004, 2005) suggest that the depositional evolution in the Subbasin underwent five discontinuous phases. These phases are divided by four boundaries at Early Triassic\Middle Triassic, Middle–Late Jurassic\Early Cretaceous, Cretaceous\Paleogene and Paleogene\Neogene time (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Integrated analyses of the Mesozoic–Cenozoic depositional systems, sandstone framework grains, detrital heavy minerals and whole sandstones geochemical compositions from the Kuqa Subbasin (Li et al , 2004, 2005) suggest that the depositional evolution in the Subbasin underwent five discontinuous phases. These phases are divided by four boundaries at Early Triassic\Middle Triassic, Middle–Late Jurassic\Early Cretaceous, Cretaceous\Paleogene and Paleogene\Neogene time (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). For each profile, we had studied depositional records, sandstone framework grain compositions, detrital heavy mineral compositions and whole‐rock geochemical compositions (Li et al , 2004, 2005), and five tectonic‐depositional phases from Lower Triassic to Neogene were primarily outlined.…”
Section: Sample Analytical Methods and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous studies have primarily concentrated on the Palaeozoic amalgamation history (e.g., Abzalov, ; Biske & Seltmann, ; Gao et al, ; Gao, John, Klemd, & Xiong, ) and Cenozoic deformation (e.g., Graham, Hendrix, Wang, & Carroll, ; Hendrix, ; Hendrix et al, ; Lin et al, ; Lu et al, ; Sobel, ), and relatively little attention has been paid to the Mesozoic. A major period of tectono‐magmatic quiescence was recognized during the Triassic and Jurassic times (Dumitru et al, ; Han, He, Wang, & Guo, ; Jolivet et al, ), and renewed tectonic uplifting occurred in late Mesozoic, especially in the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous period, as demonstrated by sedimentological and structural studies in the Junggar Basin (Jolivet, Bourquin, & Heilbronn, ; Yang et al, ) and Kuqa Sub‐basin of the Tarim Basin (Dumitru et al, ; Li et al, ; Li, Song, Peng, Wang, & Zhang, ), which flank the western Tianshan Orogen on the north and south. However, the Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous reactivation may have been caused by far‐field geodynamic processes of either the closure of the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean (Jolivet et al, ) or the collision of the Karakoram–Lhasa Block with the southern Asian margin (Hendrix et al, ; Sobel, ), because the Mongol–Okhotsk Ocean mainly closed on a relative short time scale (10 Ma) around the latest Jurassic–earliest Cretaceous transition (Nachtergaele et al, ; Wilhem, Windley, & Stamp, ; Yang, Guo, Song, Li, & He, ), which almost overlaps with the collision of Karakoram–Lhasa Block from late Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (Li et al, ; Yang, Guo, & Luo, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The western Tianshan Orogen extends east–west for 2,500 km through western China, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, and Uzbekistan in central Asia, with the highest peak up to 7,400 m (Allen & Windley, ; Jia, Fu, Jolivet, & Zheng, ). As an important segment of the Central Asian Orogenic Belt, the western Tianshan Orogen has experienced multiple accretions of island arcs and amalgamations of different continental blocks during the Palaeozoic (Charvet et al, ; Glorie et al, ; Windley, Alexeiev, Xiao, Kröner, & Badarch, ) and complex intracontinental structural reactivations during the Meso‐Cenozoic period, which controlled coeval basin‐range evolution and surface process (Li, Guo, Wang, & Lin, ; Li & Peng, ). Previous studies have primarily concentrated on the Palaeozoic amalgamation history (e.g., Abzalov, ; Biske & Seltmann, ; Gao et al, ; Gao, John, Klemd, & Xiong, ) and Cenozoic deformation (e.g., Graham, Hendrix, Wang, & Carroll, ; Hendrix, ; Hendrix et al, ; Lin et al, ; Lu et al, ; Sobel, ), and relatively little attention has been paid to the Mesozoic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%