2012
DOI: 10.1029/2011jd017025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesospheric concentric gravity waves generated by multiple convective storms over the North American Great Plain

Abstract: [1] We report on six continuous hours of OH airglow imager observations (at z $ 87 km) of convectively generated gravity waves (GWs) near Fort Collins, Colorado, on the evening of 08 September 2005. These GWs appeared as nearly concentric rings, and had epicenters near the locations of deep convection in three thunderstorms in Colorado, Nebraska and South Dakota. Using GOES satellite and weather radar observations, we show that the GWs closely follow the thunderstorms. Using the background wind from a nearby r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
83
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
(137 reference statements)
11
83
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The best‐fit depth and duration have been found to be ∼10 km and χ ∼10 min, respectively. This duration is consistent with high‐time‐resolution NEXRAD data, which found that a new plume within a thunderstorm typically appears every 15–20 min [ Vadas and Yue , ]. Note that this 15–20 min time period includes the growth and collapse of the plume plus the time for the formation of a new plume.…”
Section: High‐frequency Gws Excited By a Single Convective Plumesupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The best‐fit depth and duration have been found to be ∼10 km and χ ∼10 min, respectively. This duration is consistent with high‐time‐resolution NEXRAD data, which found that a new plume within a thunderstorm typically appears every 15–20 min [ Vadas and Yue , ]. Note that this 15–20 min time period includes the growth and collapse of the plume plus the time for the formation of a new plume.…”
Section: High‐frequency Gws Excited By a Single Convective Plumesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We determine F 0 by calculating the body force solution numerically in time and linearly scaling by the maximum updraft velocity. The “best‐fit” plume duration and depth have been determined primarily via comparison of the model results with the amplitudes and parameters of concentric GWs from convective plumes as observed in the OH airglow near the mesopause [ Vadas et al ., , , ]. The best‐fit depth and duration have been found to be ∼10 km and χ ∼10 min, respectively.…”
Section: High‐frequency Gws Excited By a Single Convective Plumementioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Typical wavelengths for such events fall in the range of ∼20-30 km. In the presence of wind shear, the rings are morphed into asymmetric, banded, or linearly oriented patterns (40). The DNB provides a more complete picture of these structures than surface-based systems, particularly for cloudy scenes or remote regions (e.g., Fig.…”
Section: Suomi Makes a Splash With Global Nightglow Imagerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most energetic part of the gravity wave spectrum is excited in the troposphere, with prominent source mechanisms being the flow over topography (e.g., Smith et al 2008), convection (e.g., Vadas et al 2012), flow deformation, and vertical shear at upper-level fronts (Plougonven and Zhang 2014). As internal gravity waves distribute energy and momentum in the atmosphere, they represent a prominent coupling mechanism between the troposphere and the middle atmosphere (e.g., Fritts and Alexander 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%