2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscopic orbital paramagnetism: The role of zero-point energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where x = Cμ 0 H, and C is the initial slope of the reduced magnetization curve. 51 Fits of eq 3 to the VSM RTmagnetization curve corresponding to the TiO 2 -H2-P40 sample (Figure 5b) give fit parameters C = 4.22 ± 0.06 T −1 and M S = 9.54 ± 0.04 A/m, which are very similar to those reported for pure CeO 2 nanoparticles by Coey et al 6 Raman Spectroscopy. To detect the structural modifications introduced by thermal treatments, we performed Raman scattering measurements (see spectra in Figure 6a).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where x = Cμ 0 H, and C is the initial slope of the reduced magnetization curve. 51 Fits of eq 3 to the VSM RTmagnetization curve corresponding to the TiO 2 -H2-P40 sample (Figure 5b) give fit parameters C = 4.22 ± 0.06 T −1 and M S = 9.54 ± 0.04 A/m, which are very similar to those reported for pure CeO 2 nanoparticles by Coey et al 6 Raman Spectroscopy. To detect the structural modifications introduced by thermal treatments, we performed Raman scattering measurements (see spectra in Figure 6a).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This frame has previously been used in the context of Au thin films and nanoparticles , and ZnO and CeO 2 nanoparticles . Based on the GOP model, the magnetization curve can be adjusted to the expression where x = C μ 0 H , and C is the initial slope of the reduced magnetization curve . Fits of eq to the VSM RT-magnetization curve corresponding to the TiO 2 -H2-P40 sample (Figure b) give fit parameters C = 4.22 ± 0.06 T –1 and M S = 9.54 ± 0.04 A/m, which are very similar to those reported for pure CeO 2 nanoparticles by Coey et al…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%