The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.91.062404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscopic Hamiltonian for the fluctuations of adsorbed Lennard-Jones liquid films

Abstract: We use Monte Carlo simulations of a Lennard-Jones fluid adsorbed on a short-range planar wall substrate to study the fluctuations in the thickness of the wetting layer, and we get a quantitative and consistent characterization of their mesoscopic Hamiltonian, H [ξ ]. We have observed important finite-size effects, which were hampering the analysis of previous results obtained with smaller systems. The results presented here support an appealing simple functional form for H[ξ ], close but not exactly equal to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The progress made in Refs. [7,13,14] was to develop a DFT based method for calculating g(h), or strictly speaking g(Γ), that is valid over the whole range of values of h. Note that one can also use a molecular dynamics computer simulation based method for calculating g(h) [33][34][35][36][37]. For simple Lennard-Jones like fluids it was shown [7,13,14] that the following form gives a good fit to the binding potential over the whole range:…”
Section: Wetting Behaviour and The Form Of The Binding Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The progress made in Refs. [7,13,14] was to develop a DFT based method for calculating g(h), or strictly speaking g(Γ), that is valid over the whole range of values of h. Note that one can also use a molecular dynamics computer simulation based method for calculating g(h) [33][34][35][36][37]. For simple Lennard-Jones like fluids it was shown [7,13,14] that the following form gives a good fit to the binding potential over the whole range:…”
Section: Wetting Behaviour and The Form Of The Binding Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) The final equilibrium state obtained for the same volume of liquid on the surface undergoing both spreading and dewetting on a background film h = h0. The binding potential used is g2, with initial conditions that were evolved to reach these final equilibria given in(37) for the spreading situation, and (38) for dewetting. (b) shows the corresponding evolutions of the normalised free energy differences, noting that for spreading F (0) = 16.89 and F (∞) = 0.046, whereas for dewetting F (0) = 0.44 and F (∞) = 0.15.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical studies on this topic indicate that the substrate distorts the liquidvapor profile, 40,41 and therefore conveys a film height dependence to the surface tension (also known as position dependent stiffness) of which there are currently strong indications from computer simulations. 42,43 Recently, we studied the interface fluctuations of an adsorbed film in the presence of a long range external field. [44][45][46] In this case, the liquid-vapor interface feels the substrate directly via the long range forces, rather than indirectly, via weak substrate-fluid correlations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection with the curvature expansion is evident as, taking into account Eqs. (36) and (39), we find that…”
Section: B General Diagrammatic Approachmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…The search for a link between truly microscopic approaches and these mesoscopic descriptions can be traced back to van der Waals [24] and continue to this day, and in the past few years considerable effort has been invested in establishing this connection more rigorously. For example, intrinsic sampling methods use a many-body percolative, approach to identify the interfacial position from the underlying microscopic molecular configurations, and this has been extensively used in simulations [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. A second, related, development has been the attempt to sys-tematically derive an interfacial model for wetting transitions in settings involving short-ranged intermolecular forces from a more microscopic starting point [39][40][41][42][43][44][45].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%