2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2020.106974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscale modelling of concrete – A review of geometry generation, placing algorithms, constitutive relations and applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
7

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 200 publications
0
40
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous methods to model aggregate geometry in mesoscale models and 3D scanning is one of the main techniques. X-ray computed tomography (XCT) scanning is a widely used 3D scanning method to scan aggregates and concrete samples to generate the mesostructure of concrete (Huang et al 2015;Liu et al 2018a;Ren et al 2015;Shuguang and Qingbin 2015;Thilakarathna et al 2020b). However, it is time-consuming and costly to scan aggregate particles using XCT (Anochie-Boateng et al 2013) and XCT has a strict safety and radiation monitoring specifications (Anochie-Boateng et al 2012).…”
Section: D Scanning Of Aggregate Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are numerous methods to model aggregate geometry in mesoscale models and 3D scanning is one of the main techniques. X-ray computed tomography (XCT) scanning is a widely used 3D scanning method to scan aggregates and concrete samples to generate the mesostructure of concrete (Huang et al 2015;Liu et al 2018a;Ren et al 2015;Shuguang and Qingbin 2015;Thilakarathna et al 2020b). However, it is time-consuming and costly to scan aggregate particles using XCT (Anochie-Boateng et al 2013) and XCT has a strict safety and radiation monitoring specifications (Anochie-Boateng et al 2012).…”
Section: D Scanning Of Aggregate Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous researchers have used various algorithms to distribute the aggregates inside the bounding geometry as reviewed in (Thilakarathna et al 2020b). However, most of the algorithms are for parameterized aggregate shapes such as spheres (Shahbeyk et al 2011;Wriggers and Moftah 2006), ellipsoids (Häfner et al 2003), convex polyhedrons (Zhou et al…”
Section: Placing Algorithms For Scanned Aggregatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forti et al (2020) investigate failure behavior using a model that combines damage and plasticity on mortars for compressive softening, and cohesive fracture on interface elements for tensile softening and cracking. For an extensive review of geometry generation, particle distribution algorithm, constitutive relations and applications, the reader is referred to Thilakarathna et al (2020). For mesoscale models and material behavior, the reader is referred to Caballero et al (2006), Häfner et al (2006), Wriggers and Moftah (2006), Kim and Al-Rub (2011), Du et al (2014), Yılmaz and Molinari (2017), Zhou et al (2017), Zhang et al (2018), Li et al (2019), Tang et al (2019) and Meng et al (2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It provides high resolution of the real aggregate distributions, while the result represents only one specific specimen that is captured. The parametrization approach can be the more applicable method to generate various mesostructure models by using parametrical algorithms [6]. MCM by the parameterization modeling approach includes two approaches; generation of the random shape aggregates, referred to as random shape aggregate model (RSAM), and the random placement of the simplified aggregates (e.g., circle) into the sample domain [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%