1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7788(96)01006-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesoscale meteorological and air quality impacts of increased urban albedo and vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
8

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
42
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The mostly horizontal configuration of the city increases the urban albedo, as noted by Aida & Gotoh (1982). The use of light colours (houses are generally whitewashed or painted in light colours) would further increase the urban reflectance (twice as much as modern cities; Taha et al 1997). The roofs, being the main exposed surfaces, need to be carefully designed.…”
Section: Urban Fabricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mostly horizontal configuration of the city increases the urban albedo, as noted by Aida & Gotoh (1982). The use of light colours (houses are generally whitewashed or painted in light colours) would further increase the urban reflectance (twice as much as modern cities; Taha et al 1997). The roofs, being the main exposed surfaces, need to be carefully designed.…”
Section: Urban Fabricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increase the albedo on roofs as a mitigation strategy is important, given the size of the city that corresponds to the roofs; therefore, it is logical to consider options for reducing the thermal load on them. For example, an increase in the albedo 0.07 on surfaces of buildings and roads can decrease by up to 2˚C ambient temperature [24] [25]. Estimates indicate that by reducing the solar radiation absorbed by roads and parking lots from 90% to 65% the peak air temperature can decrease by 0.6˚C [26].…”
Section: Mitigation Of Urban Heat Islandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Chicago, an increase in tree cover by 10%, or planting about three trees per building lot, could reduce the total energy for heating and cooling by US$ 50-90 per dwelling unit per year (McPherson et al, 1997). Taha et al (1997) found that urban trees could cool the city on the average by about 0.3-1.0 0 C, and total annual energy savings could attain US$ 10-35/100 m 2 of roof area of residential and commercial buildings. The urban trees in Los Angeles could potentially save about US$ 93 million of energy use per year and could reduce peak power demand by 0.9 GW (Akbari, 2002).…”
Section: Microclimate Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%