2013
DOI: 10.4236/ojd.2013.24014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesopic Visual Contrast Sensitivity in Patients with Major Depression

Abstract: The present study evaluated the effects of major depression on visual contrast sensitivity (CS) at low mesopic luminance (.7 cd/m 2 mean luminance), a condition that has been little explored in the literature. We measured spatial visual CS in 20 male volunteers aged 20 -30 years, including 10 healthy individuals and 10 medicated individuals with major depression, to linear sine-wave gratings of .25, 1.0, and 4.0 cycles per degree (cpd) of visual angle using the psychophysical staircase method with forced choic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using a greater sample size, a later study found that both SAD patients (n = 46) and non-seasonally depressed patients (n = 17) had greater contrast sensitivity in static Gabors with a high spatial frequency, compared with healthy controls (n = 25; Wesner & Tan, 2006). In contrast, several studies found that contrast sensitivity for MDD patients was weaker than that for controls (Bubl et al, 2009;Fam et al, 2013;Nogueira et al, 2013). These inconsistent results might reflect differences in visual functioning for different subtypes of depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using a greater sample size, a later study found that both SAD patients (n = 46) and non-seasonally depressed patients (n = 17) had greater contrast sensitivity in static Gabors with a high spatial frequency, compared with healthy controls (n = 25; Wesner & Tan, 2006). In contrast, several studies found that contrast sensitivity for MDD patients was weaker than that for controls (Bubl et al, 2009;Fam et al, 2013;Nogueira et al, 2013). These inconsistent results might reflect differences in visual functioning for different subtypes of depression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A few studies have directly examined the differences in contrast sensitivity between MDD and healthy controls (Bubl et al, 2009; Fam et al, 2013; Murphy et al, 1993; Nogueira et al, 2013; Szabó et al, 2004; Wesner & Tan, 2006), and have produced inconsistent results. Two of these studies failed to find significant differences between MDD with a seasonal pattern (also called seasonal affective disorder [SAD]) and healthy controls on contrast sensitivity (Murphy et al, 1993; Szabó et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving cognitive functioning (information processing speed, attention control, short term memory, learning and cognitive planning, sensory discrimination) is important for diminishing the negative effects from depression [21,22]. Self-expression by means of overt and assertive behaviour, as well as self-realization give the possibilities for students' improved cognitive functioning in the academic environment [23], and aesthetic experiences in the learning process also contribute to positive emotions and further development of cognitive functioning by means of complex processing of information [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Previous research on major depressive disorder has suggested that the severity of depressive symptoms is correlated with the visual system in several aspects. [8][9][10] In addition, several studies reported that older individuals with visual impairment had a higher prevalence of depression compared with their peers with normal vision. 11,12 Over 60% of women with endogenous depression showed disturbed color vision in a previous study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%