2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mesophyll conductance to CO2 is the most significant limitation to photosynthesis at different temperatures and water availabilities in Antarctic vascular species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
6
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of low temperatures on photosynthesis in the Antarctic species studied here was mainly driven by diffusional limitations, rather than biochemical ones, as has been reported for Antarctic vascular plants (Saéz et al, 2018) and by other important environmental stresses such as water stress (Flexas Kappen et al, 1989 30 O 2 evolution Wilson, 1990 0-10 Net CO 2 uptake Davey and Rothery, 1997 10 Net CO 2 uptake Block et al, 2009 20-25 Net CO 2 uptake Present study 19-23 ETR Present study Tortula saxicola 10-20 Net CO 2 uptake Davey and Rothery, 1997 Warnstorfia sarmentosum ≥20 Net CO 2 uptake Block et al, 2009 *Data from Nakatsubo (2002) and Kallio and Heinonen (1975) are excluded because measurements of over-watered samples were clearly performed at non-steady state conditions and variation of CO 2 assimilation might be associated with a variation of interstitial water during measurements rather than with temperature. Nadal and Flexas, 2018).…”
Section: A B D Csupporting
confidence: 67%
“…The effect of low temperatures on photosynthesis in the Antarctic species studied here was mainly driven by diffusional limitations, rather than biochemical ones, as has been reported for Antarctic vascular plants (Saéz et al, 2018) and by other important environmental stresses such as water stress (Flexas Kappen et al, 1989 30 O 2 evolution Wilson, 1990 0-10 Net CO 2 uptake Davey and Rothery, 1997 10 Net CO 2 uptake Block et al, 2009 20-25 Net CO 2 uptake Present study 19-23 ETR Present study Tortula saxicola 10-20 Net CO 2 uptake Davey and Rothery, 1997 Warnstorfia sarmentosum ≥20 Net CO 2 uptake Block et al, 2009 *Data from Nakatsubo (2002) and Kallio and Heinonen (1975) are excluded because measurements of over-watered samples were clearly performed at non-steady state conditions and variation of CO 2 assimilation might be associated with a variation of interstitial water during measurements rather than with temperature. Nadal and Flexas, 2018).…”
Section: A B D Csupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Most of the studies characterizing the main physiological and biochemical drivers ( g s , g m , and Rubisco) at low temperatures have been performed in crops and model plants (Ort et al, ; Perdomo, Carmo‐Silva, Hermida‐Carrera, Flexas, & Galmés, ; Xiong et al, ; Yamori, Hikosaka, & Way, ). Recent studies with DA showed that both in the field conditions and at lab conditions when plants growing at 15°C where exposed to 10°C, g m was the most relevant photosynthetic limitation (Sáez et al, ; Sáez et al, ). Studies carried out with other species have shown that g m reduced more drastically than g s at low temperatures (von Caemmerer & Evans, ; Warren, ; Warren & Dreyer, ; Yamori, Suzuki, Noguchi, Nakai, & Terashima, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only two native vascular plants of Antarctica (Figure c) have been extensively studied in terms of temperature, water availability and nutrient deficiency (Sáez et al , , ,b; Clemente‐Moreno et al , , ). Interestingly, for both species, g m is the most important limitation under low temperature, drought and nutrient deficiency, as has been previously reported for species from semiarid‐arid environments (Galmés et al , ).…”
Section: Photosynthesis In Extreme Environments: Taking Advantage Of mentioning
confidence: 99%