2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3399334
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Meson Production Simulations for a Mercury Jet Target

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(3 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The heat load estimates shown above are consistent with those found using MARS simulations [4], except for the superconducting coils, which are a factor of two higher. Investigations of the energy deposition in simple target geometries show that the particle (hadronic) showers in FLUKA are more penetrating than those in MARS.…”
Section: Study 2a Geometrysupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heat load estimates shown above are consistent with those found using MARS simulations [4], except for the superconducting coils, which are a factor of two higher. Investigations of the energy deposition in simple target geometries show that the particle (hadronic) showers in FLUKA are more penetrating than those in MARS.…”
Section: Study 2a Geometrysupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This paper presents a study of the power deposition and radiation environment of the Neutrino Factory target station using FLUKA [2] simulations. Also shown are comparisons with results from MARS [3,4] simulations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], the maximum production of mesons up to a point before the cooling channel is approximately 0.035 mesons per proton per GeV of proton kinetic energy. From [3], the ratio of this merit factor to the same factor into the neutrino factory acceptance at the end of a cooling channel is approximately 1.92.…”
Section: Beam Current From Front Endmentioning
confidence: 99%